Powered by TravelServer Software
Cruise Home Featured Profile Cruise Talk Cruise Search Cruise News
Book a Cruise
 - CruiseServer
 - Search Caribbean
 - Search Alaska
 - Search Europe
 - 888.881.0188

Reviews
 - Ship Reviews
 - Dream Cruise
 - Ship of the Month
 - Reader Reviews
 - Submit a Review
 - Millennium Cruise

Community
 - Join Cruise Club
 - Cruise News
 - Cruise Survey
 - Cruise Jobs
 - Special Needs

Forums
 - Cruise Talk
 - Air Talk
 - Destination Talk
 - Hotel Talk

Industry
 - New Ship Guide
 - Former Ships
 - Port Information
 - Inspection Scores
 - Shipyards
 - Ship Cams
 - Freighter Travel
 - Potpourri

Shopping
 - Books
 - Videos
 - Reservations
 - Internet Specials
 - Web Deals

Contact Us
 - Reservations
 - Mail
 - Feedback
 - Suggest-a-Site
 - Traveler's Poll
 - About Us

Click Here to Join Cruise ClubWelcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.


  Cruise Talk
  Ocean Liners and Classic Cruise Ships
  22/01/1961 - 40 years have passed

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   22/01/1961 - 40 years have passed
PauloMestre
First Class Passenger

Posts: 226
From:Alhos Vedros, Setubal, Portugal
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 01-22-2001 09:59 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for PauloMestre   Click Here to Email PauloMestre     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In what might be the largest post ever in this board I wished to remember a significant event of maritime history: the first political-driven hijack at sea.

Photo of the "Santa Maria":

Click here for a larger version of the image

The Assault of the “Santa Maria”

22nd January of 1961, 1h30 am, onboard the largest and most luxurious Portuguese ocean liner, the “Santa Maria”, a group of 24 freedom fighters gather on the upper decks, protected by darkness. They are about to start “Operation Dulcineia”, the assault of the ship.

The plan and the men behind it:

Henrique Galvão was a Portuguese Army captain living in exile in Venezuela since November of 1959 and leader of DRIL - Iberian Revolutionary Leadership of Liberation - a structure composed by opponents to Franco and Salazar regimes. They were planning a revolutionary action against the fascist regimes that dominated the Iberian Peninsula at that time.

The planning of the attack had been finished in July of 1961, and was very ambitious: take control of the “Santa Maria”, travel towards the Spanish colony of Fernando Pó, in the Gulf of Guinea. After "conquering" it, his plan was to attack Luanda and, from Angola, start an action aiming the fall of the governments of Lisbon and Madrid.

The company official color postcard of "Santa Maria":


Click here for a larger version of the image

Why “Santa Maria”? Because the rebel group saw her as being much better than the several Spanish passenger ships that used to travel to Central America. Although "Infante Dom Henrique" (now the laid-up “Seawind Crown”) and "Principe Perfeito" (laid-up in Piraeus, Greece) were more recent and modern ships, "Santa Maria" was a prestige ship by excellence, owing that to the fact of being the only Portuguese ship of passengers to keep a regular connection between Portugal and the United States of America.

The Assault:

"Santa Maria" had left Lisbon on the 9th of January of 1961 on one of her regular trips to Central America, arriving to the harbour of La Guaira in Venezuela on the 20th of January.

Among the passengers shipped in this harbour, there was a group of 20 members of the DRIL. Fourteen entered the ship as regular paying passengers, the remainder used visitor passes and managed to stay onboard after the ship departure.

One day later in Curacao, Henrique Galvão and three other DRIL members entered the “Santa Maria” (Galvão was a figure knowned to the Portuguese state police, PIDE, and feared that entering the ship to soon would increase the risk of discovery by the ship officers).

The group members consisted of: 13 Portuguese, 10 Spaniards and 1 Venezuelan.

After leaving Curacao, "Santa Maria" sailed towards Port Everglades, in Florida, carrying 612 passengers and 350 crew members, under the command of the Merchant Navy captain Mário Simões da Maia.

At 1.45 AM (local time) on the 22nd of January of 1961, the 24 men under the command of Henrique Galvão took the navigating bridge and the wireless room, subordinating the officers on duty at that time. The third mate João José do Nascimento Costa that was on the bridge offered armed resistance to the attackers and after a quick firefight he was killed and another officer severely wounded (afterwards the Portuguese Government would state that this had been a cold-blooded murder). The captain (that was sleeping in his cabin) and the rest of the crew surrendered peacefully, and that ended the first part of the plan. In an act of defiance to the Iberian regimes, the ship was renamed “Santa Liberdade” by the rebels, in an allusion to the freedom that the peoples of Portugal and Spain were eager to obtain.

Afterwards, "Santa Maria" changed her route to East, trying to reach, as quickly as they can, the Atlantic Ocean. On the 23rd of January, the ship approached the Island of Santa Lucia and a ship launch disembarked two seriously wounded persons and five crew members for humanitarian reasons. This fact seriously compromised the possibility of reaching the coast of Africa without being detected (one of the stewards that landed in Santa Lucia cabled the company office in Lisbon and the Portuguese Government was alerted to the assault).

The Portuguese Government asked the British Government help to return the “Santa Maria” to her legitimate owners, so a British frigate (the “Rothesay”), after receiving approval from the Admiralty, was sent after the liner. Hours had passed since the departure of the “Santa Maria”, the search done by the frigate ended being fruitless, so she returned to Port of Spain for refuelling. The “Rothesay” didn’t return to the search (or any other British ship) because the Admiralty considered the liner to be out of reach by the Royal Navy. The Portuguese Government then turned to the United States Government for help. The U.S. Department of Defence considered the “Santa Maria” assault as an act of piracy, ordered the U.S. Navy to locate her and several vessels were sent after her.

The “Santa Maria” steamed during two days at full speed (she was suffering from engine problems and the hull in need to be cleaned), deeper in to the Atlantic Ocean but on the 25th, a Danish freighter spotted her and radioed her position, allowing an American airplane to locate "Santa Maria" some hours after that incident. Later that day the commander of the U.S. Atlantic fleet, Admiral Robert Dennison, talked on the radio with Henrique Galvão trying to arrange a meeting that allowed a peaceful solution to the problem.

The “Santa Maria” kept an Eastward course but was still relatively close to the Brazilian coast, so on the afternoon of the 29th January, when the liner was 30 miles of the Brazilian harbour of Recife, Henrique Galvão accepted to meet a delegate of Admiral Dennison, the Rear-Admiral Allen Smith.

Two days later, January 31st, an American fleet composed of four destroyers approached the liner, 35 miles of the coast of Brazil. The Rear-Admiral Smith was sent onboard the liner for a meeting with Henrique Galvão. The meeting ended 3 hours later and was inconclusive but Captain Henrique Galvão had partially agreed to dock in the nearby port of Recife the following day so that the passengers could go free.

On the following day, February 1st, “Santa Maria” was still at sea but closer to shore and was being kept under close surveillance by five warships (2 American and 3 Brazilian). Henrique Galvão wanted to refuel the ship and return to sea but the Brazilian Government wasn’t going to give permission to that.

Finally, on the 2nd February, "Saint Maria" anchored in the Brazilian harbour of Recife, allowing the landing of all the passengers and members of the crew. The sinking of "Santa Maria" was taken in consideration, but they gave up of that idea and next day they surrendered to the Brazilian authorities asking for political asylum.

"Santa Maria " was then returned to her legitimate owners: Companhia Colonial de Navegação.

The passengers of "Santa Maria", were then transferred to "Vera Cruz", which left Recife on the 5th of February, and arrived to Lisbon nine days later, after having stopped in Tenerife, Funchal and Vigo. On the other hand, "Santa Maria" sailed from Recife on the 7th February, arriving to the Tagus River, in Lisbon, on the 16th February, going alongside the Alcântara quay and received a hero’s welcome. All the top members of the Portuguese Government appeared to welcome her and that included the dictator Salazar who personally shakes the hands of all officers and crew.

The arrival of "Santa Maria" to Lisbon after the assault:


Click here for a larger version of the image

Final words:
The Portuguese regime tried to portrait Portugal as a quiet, peaceful country, where everybody agreed with the policy imposed by the State backed União Nacional (Portugal only official party). The raid proved the contrary: there were great internal divergences (muffled by the repressive means of the State police - PIDE) and this gesture was the only way that the political opposition could strike a blow at the regime façade.

The “Santa Maria” raid fell to relative obscurity after all this years (the idea of hijacking a plane/ship for political motives spread like a wild fire in the years to come, especially in the 70’s and 80’s), and in the collective memory the “Achille Lauro” assault became almost a trademark for ship hijacking due to political reasons, but there is a pivotal difference on the two events: the only death onboard the “Santa Maria” happened because the officer tried to defend the ship bridge at all cost, while on the “Achille Lauro” a helpless passenger was murdered.

But both incidents were equal in one aspect: they tarnished the memory of two perfectly good ships that shouldn’t been remembered that way.

********************************************

Regards

Paulo Mestre

[This message has been edited by PauloMestre (edited 01-23-2001).]

IP: Logged

Cunardcoll
First Class Passenger

Posts: 118
From:Zonhoven, Limburg, Belgium
Registered: Apr 2000

posted 01-22-2001 03:18 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Cunardcoll   Click Here to Email Cunardcoll     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I just found out that the Santa Maria was build in Belgium , Hoboken near Antwerp , about 80 km from where I live , I also found an old book about ships , it has a great view from the Santa Maria , I will scan it later and post it here.

IP: Logged

PauloMestre
First Class Passenger

Posts: 226
From:Alhos Vedros, Setubal, Portugal
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 01-22-2001 05:14 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PauloMestre   Click Here to Email PauloMestre     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cunardcoll:
I just found out that the Santa Maria was build in Belgium , Hoboken near Antwerp , about 80 km from where I live , I also found an old book about ships , it has a great view from the Santa Maria , I will scan it later and post it here.

The sisters "Vera Cruz", "Santa Maria", the tourist class ship "Uige" and the flagship of the Portuguese Merchant Navy "Infante Dom Henrique" were all built by the Belgian shipyard of John Cockerill. When the "Vera Cruz" was built it was the biggest ship built in Belgium until that time, so the King of Belgium assisted the launch and afterwards visited the ship.

If could post your picture it would nice.

P.S.
Altered the post a bit. Hope you all like it.

Regards

Paulo Mestre

[This message has been edited by PauloMestre (edited 01-22-2001).]

IP: Logged

Green
First Class Passenger

Posts: 824
From:Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jul 99

posted 01-22-2001 06:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Green     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wow!!! - Very interesting - Remember it but didn't think it was THAT long ago - how time files!

IP: Logged

Ryndam
First Class Passenger

Posts: 106
From:Genoa (Italy)
Registered: May 2000

posted 01-23-2001 01:13 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ryndam   Click Here to Email Ryndam     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hello Paulo,
thank you very much for the information about the Santa Maria hijacking. I've always been interested in the accident, but I've never found any detailed information. If you know any books about this hijacking, please pass me the titles.

Ryndam

IP: Logged

PauloMestre
First Class Passenger

Posts: 226
From:Alhos Vedros, Setubal, Portugal
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 01-23-2001 09:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PauloMestre   Click Here to Email PauloMestre     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ryndam:
Hello Paulo,
thank you very much for the information about the Santa Maria hijacking. I've always been interested in the accident, but I've never found any detailed information. If you know any books about this hijacking, please pass me the titles.

Ryndam




There are several books on the assault (mainly written in Portuguese) but I don't have their names, so I will go look for them and let you know.

Regards

Paulo Mestre

IP: Logged

Baker
First Class Passenger

Posts: 99
From:Melbourne by the Bay. Australia
Registered: May 2000

posted 01-26-2001 11:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Baker   Click Here to Email Baker     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That brought back some memories Paulo, I was at sea when that Hijak took place and never really understood what it was all about. We sailed into Lisbon in early 1963 and we docked close to the Santa Maria, she had been repainted and her blackened funnel was cleaned up as it had been covered in soot after she had been pushed to the limit.
Thanks for the info.. B

IP: Logged

CTrail
First Class Passenger

Posts: 241
From:Kitchener, ON Canada
Registered: Apr 99

posted 01-27-2001 08:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for CTrail   Click Here to Email CTrail     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Paulo, I never new the history behind this incident. Thanks for the information. Both of these and all similar incidents are tragic.
However leaving that to one side, I certainly hope you were not trying to legitimize the Santa Maria incident with your statement

"but there is a pivotal difference on the two events: the only death onboard the “Santa Maria” happened because the officer tried to defend the ship bridge at all cost, while on the “Achille Lauro” a helpless passenger was murdered."

There was no pivotal difference, both incidents were the product of individuals or groups that wanted to impose their wants or desires using innocent people as a shield or pawn. The killing of the officer that defended the bridge and in turn the passengers from these intruders was as much cold blooded murder as the passenger that was killed on the Achille Lauro.

It is terrible that we remember these ships for the unfortuate incidents that took place and not just as great 'Dames' of the sea.

Thankgoodnessthisisinourpast

Peter

IP: Logged

PauloMestre
First Class Passenger

Posts: 226
From:Alhos Vedros, Setubal, Portugal
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 01-27-2001 02:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PauloMestre   Click Here to Email PauloMestre     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by CTrail:

However leaving that to one side, I certainly hope you were not trying to legitimize the Santa Maria incident with your statement

"but there is a pivotal difference on the two events: the only death onboard the “Santa Maria” happened because the officer tried to defend the ship bridge at all cost, while on the “Achille Lauro” a helpless passenger was murdered."

There was no pivotal difference, both incidents were the product of individuals or groups that wanted to impose their wants or desires using innocent people as a shield or pawn. The killing of the officer that defended the bridge and in turn the passengers from these intruders was as much cold blooded murder as the passenger that was killed on the Achille Lauro.

It is terrible that we remember these ships for the unfortuate incidents that took place and not just as great 'Dames' of the sea.

Thankgoodnessthisisinourpast

Peter


Peter, I know that remark might mean a lot of things but I see that I wasn't clear enough with that frase. Let me explain, I was a personal remark trying to show the differences between the men involved in both incidents.

While on the "Santa Maria" the Henrique Galvão group tried to avoid a useless bloodshed (after a great number of passengers and all of the crew where Portuguese, the same people they were trying to help), onboard the "Achille Lauro" the Abu Abas group committed an savage act against a helpless civilian due to his religion and nationality.

Henrique Galvão later honored the officer memory when he wrote on his book "My Crusade for Portugal" that of all the officers onboard the "Santa Maria" he was the bravest of all, that died trying to defend his ship.

But an act of terrorism is always an brutal action against the rights (and lifes) of those involved, so no motives are valid to make such a thing. Under no circunstances I will support violent actions against inocents regardless the reasons.

As I said on the post the "Santa Maria" shouldn't be remembered only because of the assault but as a magnificent ship. Those who knew her told me that of all the Portuguese ocean liners of the time she was everyone's "darling".

Regards

Paulo Mestre

IP: Logged

Cambodge
First Class Passenger

Posts: 191
From:St. Michaels MD USA
Registered: Nov 1999

posted 01-28-2001 11:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Cambodge   Click Here to Email Cambodge     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Memories:
I was in US DoD Research at that time. A subject of much speculation and minimal fact to me and my colleagues was:

How did the ship become "lost" for several days? When the US Navy was invited to play a role, did the extensive anti-submarine patrols in this (remember, the cold war was significantly on), really know where the ship was? Or was this just a cover story?

Is there any poster who was in the US Navy in either military or civilian status at that time know whether the location of the ship was actually known (and they just "weren't telling") or whether all the ASW aircraft, boring holes in the sky throughout the Atlantic really 'lose' the ship for two or three days?

Just wondering.

[This message has been edited by Cambodge (edited 01-28-2001).]

IP: Logged

PauloMestre
First Class Passenger

Posts: 226
From:Alhos Vedros, Setubal, Portugal
Registered: Sep 2000

posted 01-28-2001 01:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for PauloMestre   Click Here to Email PauloMestre     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Cambodge:
Memories:
I was in US DoD Research at that time. A subject of much speculation and minimal fact to me and my colleagues was:

How did the ship become "lost" for several days? When the US Navy was invited to play a role, did the extensive anti-submarine patrols in this (remember, the cold war was significantly on), really know where the ship was? Or was this just a cover story?

Is there any poster who was in the US Navy in either military or civilian status at that time know whether the location of the ship was actually known (and they just "weren't telling") or whether all the ASW aircraft, boring holes in the sky throughout the Atlantic really 'lose' the ship for two or three days?

Just wondering.


The two day gap was due to the ineffective search done by the Royal Navy. I'm not blaming the RN just the knuckle-heads that were in charge at that time, because it the British Government wasn't very cooperative and was reluctant to use the available forces on a all-out search. On the 26th it was announced by the British Admiralty that the Royal Navy wasn't going to help on the search because no British ship was in condition to intercept the liner.

When it was evident to the Portuguese Government that the British authorities weren't going to be very helpfull they turned to the American Government. The two days correspond to the time spent by the Portuguese Government trying to get cooperation from the British and finally asking the American Government for help.

The tracking operation done by the Americans was pretty efective (it was just a confirmation of her position and heading since she had been spotted by the freighter on the 25th) so her location there after was always knowned.

The SSN-575 SEAWOLF was the most notorious of all the US Navy ships involved in the search. In the 25th of January she was ordered to locate the SANTA MARIA and follow her. The submarine finally made contact with the liner on February 1st near the Brazillian coast.

Regards

Paulo Mestre

[This message has been edited by PauloMestre (edited 01-28-2001).]

IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | CruisePage


Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.45c

Cruise Home Featured Profile Cruise Talk Cruise Search Cruise News

This page, and all contents, are © 1995-2000 by Interactive Travel Guides, Inc. and/or its suppliers.
All rights reserved.
TravelPage.com is a trademark of Interactive Travel Guides, Inc.
Powered by TravelServer Software