Welcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.
>>> Reader Reviews >>> CruisePage.com Photo Gallery >>> Join Our Cruise Club.
Latest News...Carnival Cruise Line said today that while rescue and remediation efforts continue in Baltimore Harbor following the collapse of the Key Bridge, it will temporarily move Carnival Legend’s Baltimore operations to Norfolk, Virginia. Carnival Legend is scheduled to return from its current voyage on Sunday, March 31. It will now return to Norfolk on Sunday, and guests will...
Latest News...Carnival Corporation & plc today announced it has signed an agreement with Meyer Werft shipyard for a fifth Excel-class cruise ship for its namesake Carnival Cruise Line brand, with the delivery set for 2028. In mid-February Carnival Corporation had announced the first newbuild order placed in five years with news that a fourth Excel-class ship would join the Carnival Cruise Line...
Latest News...Four Seasons, together with luxury yachting company Marc-Henry Cruise Holdings Ltd, Joint Owner/Operator, Four Seasons Yachts, and venerated Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri, continues to chart a new course of luxury at sea. As momentum builds towards the inaugural season of Four Seasons Yachts, the first 10 unique voyages are unveiled, each inviting travellers to make the iconic islands...
By contrast, if Premier Cruises had gotten the SS Canberra(instead if Edinburg Castle) and the SS Rotterdam, would the SS Canberra still be around? The Canberra could have made an excellent attraction in Southampton. What are your thoughts?
quote:Originally posted by Redlinekid2:The moment when the SS Rotterdam was transfered to Premier Cruises, I was concerned that they would alter this delightful vessel. I always felt that the ship should have been made into a floating hotel/musuem like the Queen Mary back in 1997. How times have changed for the better.By contrast, if Premier Cruises had gotten the SS Canberra(instead if Edinburg Castle) and the SS Rotterdam, would the SS Canberra still be around? The Canberra could have made an excellent attraction in Southampton. What are your thoughts?
Canberra had way too many cabins without private bath. The court cabins are a neat idea. To work as a hotel the cabins would have to be combined from 3-2 and private baths installed.
Too much of the original Canberra furnishings were gone and replaced with bland hotel furniture.
She needed a lot more work than the Rembrandterdam.
Premier was a total mess in the last 18 months although I had good experiences with them.
What they would have done with the Canberra?If Premier went into the funeral business, people would stop dying.
www.sscanberra.com
Other well known vessels that would need a lot of renovations include the QE2 and the Kungsholm, since these ships are in very good hands. However, the one vessel that will be the ultimate task to renovate is the SS United States.
quote:Originally posted by Redlinekid2: Other well known vessels that would need a lot of renovations include the QE2 and the Kungsholm,
Other well known vessels that would need a lot of renovations include the QE2 and the Kungsholm,
I thing these two (QE2 and Oceanic II) could easily sail another 5-10 years (w/general upkeep) while Canberra was outdated and on her last legs mechanically when withdrawn from service.
quote:Originally posted by lasuvidaboy:I thing these two (QE2 and Oceanic II) could easily sail another 5-10 years (w/general upkeep) while Canberra was outdated and on her last legs mechanically when withdrawn from service.
QE2 has had several major breakdowns in the past 3 years, one just a few weeks ago. Her plumbing is tempermental, and her A/C was never right from the beginning. QE2's bridge wings have major stress cracks. [source: William Flayhart]
I used to be totally anti-scrapping, but after the SSNorway debacle I learned that ships do have a finite life. I still like to see liners preserved, or if there is not much left of the original, and what is there, recent Hilton: adaptive re-use is the answer.Hotels in dense cities, training ships, floating casinos etc. are a good afterlife.
Ships Monthly called the QE2 the most successful passenger vessel ever on all accounts. Now what a successful life she have on the design and technical point of view. Manny overhauls of interior that ruined here beautiful late sixty's interiors, and exterior complete with new funnel. And even a new power plant turning here from steam ship to motor ship. She regular have a blackout and other technical problems.
Compared to the Rotterdam who have sailed almost technically trouble free and with 90% of here original interiors intact.
Fact that even after 37 years HAL service she was able to speed up to 26 knots (some reports suggest 28 knots) And that with 37 years old power plant.fact she sailed longer 41 years included here Premier years. Then QE2 39 years.
Believe the Rotterdam was the most successful of the 3 liners named. And on design (soft and hard ware) And equal in popularity among passengers compared with QE2.
Greetings Ben.
[ 10-02-2007: Message edited by: Maasdam ]
quote:Originally posted by Maasdam:[...]Ships Monthly called the QE2 the most successful passenger vessel ever on all accounts. Now what a successful life she have on the design and technical point of view. [...]
It's somehow circular reasoning. More than usually was tolerated and invested due to her prominence - and her name has certainly a lot to do with that. It's more that she is still around because she is famous than that she is famous because she is still around.
I was onboard all the ex premier ships in the Bahamas as part of the group of people taking care of them during the lay up.
Edinburgh Castle when bought by lowline was a complete mess. things improved only slightly in the lowline years. obviously not enough!lots of money was spent on the Eddie / BRBII by Cammels but to little too late really. By the time she left the Bahamas to scrap her engineroom was actually better than it had been for years. Also the upstairs mechanics were fairly good. she was killed by reputation and high fuel costs.
the problems she had during the premier days were mainly due to human error. one generator destroyed as the overspeed trip was by-passed during starting. air con, during the refit in the Bahamas before premier service most of the aircon chillers were replaced. after this work the whole brine system was acid cleaned. the mixture was too strong. the acid made its way back to the air con condensers making a mess of the tubes. a valve was left open by mistake. following inspection it was recommended to re-tube both but it was never done. in a very short time the condenser tubes failed knocking out the ships acon system. oil spill Rhode Island - valves left open during cleaning of galley drains. black out of Rhode Island - wrong anchoring position.delay in service for Premier, - boiler feed pump started with suction valve closed and over-speed by-passed. Shaft bearing problems on stbd shaft, miss alignment during repair in the UK.
Rotterdam / Rembrandt was in ok condition certainly not as god as some people claim.
BRB3 was in good order mechanically as was Oceanic.
Canberra not being sold on for further trading was due to the already mentioned cabin / bathroom problem, the complexity of the engine room by normal steam ship standards, fuel consumption was very high, manning costs very high and conditions set by P&O at the time.I was onboard when Premier inspected Canberra and they were very impressed with the overall condition of the machinery spaces.
Very informative and interesting (espacially because I like all the ships mentioned too).
Rich
quote:Originally posted by Linerrich:Here's an image from the last Big Red Boat brochure (2000) :Rich
The last thing the world needs is another SS France/SS United States National identity ripped out from the ship.
I am simply glad to see the SS Rotterdam in one piece internally. If it costs 80 Million Euros to restore/renovate a ship that still has over 90% of its original build, then the cost will certainly be higher on the QE2 and the MS Kungsholm when they follow suit.
quote:Originally posted by Redlinekid2:This was the reason why I feared for the SS Rotterdam's future with Premier Cruises. They might have destroyed the Dutch interiors of the SS Rotterdam as we know it today.The last thing the world needs is another SS France/SS United States National identity ripped out from the ship.I am simply glad to see the SS Rotterdam in one piece internally. If it costs 80 Million Euros to restore/renovate a ship that still has over 90% of its original build, then the cost will certainly be higher on the QE2 and the MS Kungsholm when they follow suit.
I remember that when Premier made there plans fore the Rembrandt public. Manny of the Rembrandt passengers from who the majority came with the ship from HAL. begun to sent Premier angry letters and e-mails but also they called theme to let theme know how there feelings about the upcoming rebuilding to Big Red Boat 2. beside that manny in the cruise industry and on cruise boards where opposite the plans.
Afraid to loose passengers Premier wisely decided not to go ahead with the rebuilding program.
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.3
More Vacation & Cruise Specials...