Welcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.
>>> Reader Reviews >>> CruisePage.com Photo Gallery >>> Join Our Cruise Club.
Latest News...Carnival Cruise Line said today that while rescue and remediation efforts continue in Baltimore Harbor following the collapse of the Key Bridge, it will temporarily move Carnival Legend’s Baltimore operations to Norfolk, Virginia. Carnival Legend is scheduled to return from its current voyage on Sunday, March 31. It will now return to Norfolk on Sunday, and guests will...
Latest News...Carnival Corporation & plc today announced it has signed an agreement with Meyer Werft shipyard for a fifth Excel-class cruise ship for its namesake Carnival Cruise Line brand, with the delivery set for 2028. In mid-February Carnival Corporation had announced the first newbuild order placed in five years with news that a fourth Excel-class ship would join the Carnival Cruise Line...
Latest News...Four Seasons, together with luxury yachting company Marc-Henry Cruise Holdings Ltd, Joint Owner/Operator, Four Seasons Yachts, and venerated Italian shipbuilder Fincantieri, continues to chart a new course of luxury at sea. As momentum builds towards the inaugural season of Four Seasons Yachts, the first 10 unique voyages are unveiled, each inviting travellers to make the iconic islands...
[ 08-01-2003: Message edited by: Ocean Liners ]
[ 08-01-2003: Message edited by: RuthPerk ]
Thanks for posting. In those days advertising agencies knew that ships are more important to portray in a brochure. These days you get (if you're lucky) a fuzzy ship image some where in the back of a beach photo. Nowadays it is all about selling abstract feelings which can be quite disappointing while in the old days brochures sold the ship and thus pure facts which are less miss leading.
Ruth are you one of the little girls playing, on the bottom picture!
Onno
[ 08-01-2003: Message edited by: Onno ]
quote:Originally posted by Onno:[QBRuth are you one of the little girls playing, on the bottom picture! [ 08-01-2003: Message edited by: Onno ][/QB]
[ 08-01-2003: Message edited by: Onno ][/QB]
Nope - not me! They aren't cute enough to be me!
But I was captivated by them and they are a good part of the reason why I'm nuts about passenger liners (the other part was that I sailed to and from Europe on the Queen Mary as a 3 year old).
Anyways, they both had such short lives and sad ends. I still think that they are amongst the most beautiful vessels ever conceived.
Regards, Kaiser
Best, Onno
[ 08-05-2003: Message edited by: Onno ]
web page
Here is a elevation graphic I made of the Michelangelo, it shows nicely how funnels and superstructure where arranged to get the distinct profile.
Petede, you are indeed lucky to have sailed both ships (to bad they are no longer around) where the interiors and onboard art of both ships the same, or did they have distinct interiors and unique art for each ship?
Picture #3 works the best if the Mike and Ralph were to have one funnel.
quote:Originally posted by Onno:But the second funnel and it’s position makes up for it an balances the entire profile!Best, Onno[ 08-05-2003: Message edited by: Onno ]
cabinclass
If Aesthetics was the reason then why not delete all port holes and create a smooth hull?
The safety reason could be the most plausible reason. Most ships that sunk after capsizing did so because the lower portholes where open and let in more water then would be the case if they where closed off. Italia Line did after all had the Andrea Doria tragedy.
Here is my vision of the Mike and Ralph as a hybrid liner-cruise ship. Had that been done originally, they may have had the long succesful career that the Oceanic, Galelleo/Marconi twins, RotterdamV and Canberra have seen. All these ships are in the 40,000 ton range.
Instead of piling balcony decks on top, I moved the 2 top bridge decks up one level and sandwiched in a balcony deck. The deck above the boat deck with cabins and a open promenade is a natural to put in balconies. Like the QE2 they are flush with the superstructure, not cantilevered.
With the extra deck the forward superstructure would be too massive. Promenade deck is extended 100' forward, allowing an obsevation deck. The forward superstructure is terraced for a sense of movement and to break up the excessive mass. Cargo hold cover is recessed.
As a cruiseship, I would leave both funnels since they play off each other and with one funnel the ship loses personality. The aft bay would be diesel electric propulsion and the forward bay would be for the MEP like the Norway.
The balcony deck ends at funnel #1 since at funnel#2 there is not enough real estate for appropriate size cabins. The fan systems would make the area way too noisy.
At the aft I added wind screens for the pool area
As usual, the redesign is to be as invisible as possible and keep the svelte character of the ship.
Thank you Onno for an excellent original to work from
[ 08-25-2003: Message edited by: desirod7 ]
Upon more thought, it shows that class division on ships does more harm than good. Topic was debated before.
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.3
More Vacation & Cruise Specials...