Log In | Customer Support
Home Book Travel Destinations Hotels Cruises Air Travel Community Search:

Search

Search CruisePage

Book a Cruise
- CruiseServer
- Search Caribbean
- Search Alaska
- Search Europe
- 888.700.TRIP

Book Online
Cruise
Air
Hotel
Car
Cruising Area:

Departure Date:
Cruise Length:

Price Range:

Cruise Line:

Buy Stuff

Reviews
- Ship Reviews
- Dream Cruise
- Ship of the Month
- Reader Reviews
- Submit a Review
- Millennium Cruise

Community
- Photo Gallery
- Join Cruise Club
- Cruise News
- Cruise News Archive
- Cruise Views
- Cruise Jobs
- Special Needs
- Maritime Q & A
- Sea Stories

Industry
- New Ship Guide
- Former Ships
- Port Information
- Inspection Scores
- Shipyards
- Ship Cams
- Ship Tracking
- Freighter Travel
- Man Overboard List
- Potpourri

Shopping
- Shirts & Hats
- Books
- Videos

Contact Us
- Reservations
- Mail
- Feedback
- Suggest-a-Site
- About Us

Reader Sites
- PamM's Site
- Ernst's Site
- Patsy's Site
- Ben's Site
- Carlos' Site
- Chris' Site
- SRead's Site


Cruise Travel - Cruise Talk
Cruise Talk Cruise News

Welcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.

>>> Reader Reviews
>>> CruisePage.com Photo Gallery
>>> Join Our Cruise Club.

Latest News...Carnival Corporation today announced that 100% of its ships across the global fleet are equipped with Starlink's high-speed, low-latency global internet connectivity. The completed installation further enhances Carnival Corporation's onboard experience for its guests and crew to provide even faster service, greater capacity, and more reliable Wi-Fi on its fleet of 90-plus ships across its portfolio...

Latest News...Villa Vie Residences, a leading innovator in modern-day residential cruising, proudly announces the new Endless Horizons program, transforming the concept of retirement for adventurers who dream of traveling the world without the hassle of planning or ongoing expenses. With a one-time payment of $299,999 USD for single occupancy and $499,999 USD for double occupancy,...

Latest News...Setting sail today for her debut season from Southampton, Celebrity Cruises’ award-winning ship, Celebrity Apex, is turning heads as she becomes the first ship in the revolutionary Edge Series to call the United Kingdom home. Celebrity Apex will kick off her European season from Southampton with an eight-night Norwegian Fjords cruise. This serene sailing will visit idyllic locations...

More Cruise News...


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Cruise Talk   » Mid-Ships Lounge   » Women and children first? (Page 1)

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!  
This topic is comprised of pages:  1  2  3  4 
 
Author Topic: Women and children first?
cruiseny
First Class Passenger
Member # 2928

posted 05-05-2003 11:52 PM      Profile for cruiseny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
On ZUIDERDAM, for the first time, we actually heard "women and children first" in regard to boarding lifeboats.

I thought they only did that on the TITANIC !

No, really, how many of you have heard this during the lifeboat drills on your cruises? We were all rather surprised. I can't say it bothered me, in fact I forgot about it until I saw a discussion about this elsewhere.

Is this usual HAL policy? Anyone know of other cruise lines/ships that also employ the "women and children first" policy with regard to boarding lifeboats in this day and age?

When they first said it I almost thought they were joking! (Like Southwest Airlines' safety briefings ... For those who don't know about those... Maybe I'll explain later. Difference here was the tone of voice, which was deadly serious!) In the end I can see where they're coming from, though I don't agree with them, but it would seem to be a touchy issue...

I could see having families with small children or other 'special needs passengers' i.e. handicapped get on first - indeed that would seem to be common sense - but the "women" part came as a bit of a surprise and as I said, it would seem to be rather politically incorrect.

It should be noted that nobody actually lined up with women in children in front and men in the back as instructed, so I don't know if it would actually be enforced and indeed I could see using "ladies first" as a rule during evacuation causing quite a lawsuit, but nevertheless it was an interesting surprise...

[ 05-05-2003: Message edited by: cruiseny ]


Posts: 4730 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
sympatico
First Class Passenger
Member # 797

posted 05-06-2003 08:40 AM      Profile for sympatico     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
On ZUIDERDAM, for the first time, we actually heard "women and children first" in regard to boarding lifeboats.

This is the norm on ALL HAL ships - don't the other ships do this? We hear it every time we attend lifeboat drill. You don't have to agree with them - this is their policy and you darned well better follow it.
Lifeboat drill is a serious matter - not some big party. HAL has experienced a lifeboat emergency twice, Prinsendam and Wind Song, and they take this matter VERY seriously.

It makes me so angry when passengers arrive at lifeboat drill in high heels, laughing and drinking and think it is a big joke. Those that do this would be the first to panic in a real emergency.

You better believe that it would be enforced! Why does everything nowadays have to be "politically correct" I'm a woman, maybe I wouldn't be a "lady" if some man was trying to push past me to get into the life boat first.


Posts: 3305 | From: Toronto, Ont. Canada | Registered: Jul 99  |  IP: Logged
WhiteStar
First Class Passenger
Member # 2740

posted 05-06-2003 09:45 AM      Profile for WhiteStar   Email WhiteStar   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by sympatico:

It makes me so angry when passengers arrive at lifeboat drill in high heels, laughing and drinking and think it is a big joke. Those that do this would be the first to panic in a real emergency.


I know what you mean. I have often thought that in an emergency I would stay in my cabin until all those yahoos were off loaded. I'd rather leave with the crew.

...And yes, every cruise I've been on has been women and children first.


Posts: 668 | From: Minnesota | Registered: Jan 2002  |  IP: Logged
joe at travelpage
Administrator
Member # 622

posted 05-06-2003 10:03 AM      Profile for joe at travelpage   Author's Homepage   Email joe at travelpage   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Disney also does this and they have the group line up with the men in the back, women in front of them and small children in front of them.

While I liked this approach, this was Disney's first year and they use entertainment staff at the muster station which didn't give me the same feeling of confidence I get with HAL where there is almost always a trained seaman or officer nearby.

The absolute worst was on Carnival's Fascination. Here's a description of the drill from a Cruise News article I wrote back in 1999.

quote:

The cruise fare included unlimited free drinks and many of the passengers on board seemed determined to take full advantage of the situation by making the bars their first stop after boarding the ship. Unfortunately, at the time only two of the Fascination's bars were open and the staff was quickly overwhelmed by angry mobs of thirsty passengers.

The open bar environment contributed to one of the most unorganized and unruly lifeboat drills we've ever seen. Many passengers failed to don their life jackets and continued drinking throughout the drill.

Carnival officers and staff seemed ill prepared to deal with the situation and the drill ended without the customary roll call for each lifeboat and some passengers never having been directed to their lifeboat station.


Joe at TravelPage.com


Posts: 29976 | From: Great Falls, Virginia | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged
cruiseny
First Class Passenger
Member # 2928

posted 05-06-2003 01:57 PM      Profile for cruiseny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by sympatico:
This is the norm on ALL HAL ships - don't the other ships do this?

Most of them don't. Princess doesn't even have a "real" lifeboat drill - it is held indoors in the lounges! Their philosophy is that all pax meet up at the lounges where the crew will escort you to the lifeboats.

RCI has a drill similar to HAL but I don't recall any "women and children first"...


Posts: 4730 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
cruiseny
First Class Passenger
Member # 2928

posted 05-06-2003 01:58 PM      Profile for cruiseny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by joe at travelpage:
Disney also does this and they have the group line up with the men in the back, women in front of them and small children in front of them.

While I liked this approach,


What makes that such a great approach? I can see putting small children in front, but what about the women/men difference?


Posts: 4730 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
M.S.Grumple
First Class Passenger
Member # 1340

posted 05-06-2003 02:22 PM      Profile for M.S.Grumple     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by cruiseny:

What makes that such a great approach? I can see putting small children in front, but what about the women/men difference?



We're the weaker sex don't you know and need tender, loving care.


Posts: 280 | From: Burlington, Ontario, Canada | Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
PamM
First Class Passenger
Member # 2127

posted 05-06-2003 02:27 PM      Profile for PamM   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by M.S.Grumple:
We're the weaker sex don't you know and need tender, loving care.

LOL Young kids tend to look more to their mother's for comfort when needed. I'd prefer my husband went before me, I'm a far stronger swimmer if need be.
I've always been told W&C first. On N Dream we were too all made to line up, no talking etc. It's a bit harder to do that when one's muster station is inside in the theatre or dining room. Names ticked off and I took great glee in watching those who'd thought they'd skip it having to have a drill the next day
Pam

Posts: 12176 | From: Cambridge, UK | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
cruiseny
First Class Passenger
Member # 2928

posted 05-06-2003 02:41 PM      Profile for cruiseny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PamM:
I'd prefer my husband went before me, I'm a far stronger swimmer if need be.

LOL .

Seriously, this is just what I mean. "Ladies first" may be common courtesy when taking orders in a restaurant, but evacuating a ship?

On an airplane, if it crashes into the water (and doesn't go right under - let's say it floats, like they show in the little "emergency booklet") do they make the men wait for all the women to be evacuated out the exits first?

What about women flight attendants?

Sorry, I just don't see the point here. "Families with children first" would be much more appropriate than "women and children first" IMHO.


Posts: 4730 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
joe at travelpage
Administrator
Member # 622

posted 05-06-2003 03:05 PM      Profile for joe at travelpage   Author's Homepage   Email joe at travelpage   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by cruiseny:

What makes that such a great approach? I can see putting small children in front, but what about the women/men difference?

Wait until you get married, then you will understand.

Joe at Travelpage.com


Posts: 29976 | From: Great Falls, Virginia | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged
Gerry
First Class Passenger
Member # 168

posted 05-06-2003 03:19 PM      Profile for Gerry     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Modern training now dictates that family units should be kept together for mustering and evacuation. That includes families with or without children. It removes panic from the equation. Cunard Line do this.
Posts: 315 | From: Miami, Florida, (originally from UK) | Registered: Jun 99  |  IP: Logged
Onno
First Class Passenger
Member # 3071

posted 05-06-2003 03:28 PM      Profile for Onno   Author's Homepage   Email Onno   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by cruiseny:
Sorry, I just don't see the point here. "Families with children first" would be much more appropriate than "women and children first" IMHO.

Not that it matters to me but now you are not being political correct. Why should lives of families with children go first over a life of a person that does not have a family or children (or just not onboard) Lives are just as equally precious family or not.

Best, Onno


Posts: 3583 | From: the Netherlands (Berenbotje ging uit varen...) | Registered: May 2002  |  IP: Logged
cruiseny
First Class Passenger
Member # 2928

posted 05-06-2003 03:52 PM      Profile for cruiseny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Onno:
Not that it matters to me but now you are not being political correct. Why should lives of families with children go first over a life of a person that does not have a family or children (or just not onboard) Lives are just as equally precious family or not.

The reason I say this is that people with small children are much more likely to need assistance and it would be best to get them out of the way first!

I think it would be safer for everyone that way, cutting down on the mayhem.


Posts: 4730 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
topgun
First Class Passenger
Member # 928

posted 05-06-2003 04:04 PM      Profile for topgun     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Having observed the masses in the stairwells, the dillybars twittering around and the general pushing and shoving during lifeboat drill, I suspect that the women and children situation would be academic in reality.
Posts: 759 | From: Burlington ont,canada Cruise center of North America | Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Malcolm @ cruisepage
Cruise Director
Member # 301

posted 05-06-2003 04:04 PM      Profile for Malcolm @ cruisepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PamM:

LOL Young kids tend to look more to their mother's for comfort when needed.

How sexist Pam , especially with all of the one parent famalies around today, the parent may well not be a woman!


Posts: 19210 | From: Essex (Just Outside London) | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged
Malcolm @ cruisepage
Cruise Director
Member # 301

posted 05-06-2003 04:07 PM      Profile for Malcolm @ cruisepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PamM:
[QB]
I'd prefer my husband went before me, I'm a far stronger swimmer if need be./QB]

I would not imagine swimming ability would play any part in your survival, if you were on a sinking ship?

(Yes, it's argue with Pam night! )


Posts: 19210 | From: Essex (Just Outside London) | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged
cruiseny
First Class Passenger
Member # 2928

posted 05-06-2003 04:18 PM      Profile for cruiseny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm @ cruisepage:
I would not imagine swimming ability would play any part in your survival, if you were on a sinking ship?

If you couldn't get in the lifeboats it would... That is, if you were in the water for a short enough period of time not to get hypothermia.


Posts: 4730 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
gohaze
First Class Passenger
Member # 586

posted 05-06-2003 04:45 PM      Profile for gohaze   Email gohaze   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm surprised that HAL is still mustering at the Boat Stations. As Gerry says above, the way to do it theses days is to muster as families at Muster Stations.That way you can then be taken to the survival craft when required.

This helps prevent panic as he mentions too, besides cutting down on potential hypothermia and allowing the crew to prepare the equipment without having panicy passengers in the way.

A much better system.
....peter


Posts: 1909 | From: Vancouver.BC | Registered: Sep 99  |  IP: Logged
cruiseny
First Class Passenger
Member # 2928

posted 05-06-2003 05:20 PM      Profile for cruiseny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by gohaze:
I'm surprised that HAL is still mustering at the Boat Stations.

So does RCI. And of course Princess does not. I don't know about anyone else these days...


Posts: 4730 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
annnthony
First Class Passenger
Member # 3733

posted 05-06-2003 05:35 PM      Profile for annnthony   Email annnthony   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Princess "muster stations" indoors have been in effect for over a year.....QE 2, most recently, has also done "muster" indoors......the rationale is "you will be properly directed from this locale"....no need to be outdoors in the emergency!!.....makes sense, and, sooner or later , they'll all be doing it indoors!
Posts: 315 | From: westwood,n.j.,USA | Registered: Mar 2003  |  IP: Logged
Commodore
First Class Passenger
Member # 1575

posted 05-06-2003 06:13 PM      Profile for Commodore     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I think this rule is rather stupid. Even though for at least a few more years I will be first if heaven forbids the unlikely event of a ship I'm onboard sinks, it makes no sense. Gender does not make lives more or less important. Especially since not separting people by age and or sex means that you can evacute many times quicker. Such as what happened on the Titanic, where First Officer Murdoch saved 2/3 of the survivors by allowing passengers to get on as quickly as possible, while Lightoller was responsible for only 1/3 of the survivors well..being survivors. Not only is it just as sexist as not allowing woman to vote or something like that, but only towards men. Now I don't want to be attacked by people who find me wrong, so I'll leave it at this I'd rather save more lives and take a while to bring families together than to allow people to die by grouping them.
Posts: 1106 | From: New Jersey | Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
PamM
First Class Passenger
Member # 2127

posted 05-06-2003 07:11 PM      Profile for PamM   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm @ cruisepage:
How sexist Pam , especially with all of the one parent famalies around today, the parent may well not be a woman!

Maybe not, but they are certainly in the majority by a long way.
Pam

Posts: 12176 | From: Cambridge, UK | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
PamM
First Class Passenger
Member # 2127

posted 05-06-2003 07:16 PM      Profile for PamM   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Malcolm @ cruisepage:
I would not imagine swimming ability would play any part in your survival, if you were on a sinking ship?
(Yes, it's argue with Pam night! )


Unless the water was icy and hypothermia set in, I expect I'd have more of a chance than most if there was no room in the boat, I've done a lot of long distance swimming in the sea. Mr P on the other hand would only be able to float and wait for help.
Pam

Posts: 12176 | From: Cambridge, UK | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
PamM
First Class Passenger
Member # 2127

posted 05-06-2003 07:20 PM      Profile for PamM   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If time was of the essence it would also make more sense to get the able bodied aboard and off first. The elderley and disabled..well, I'm not sure, but if the choice was for 100 fit people, or 10 elderley/disabled..which would people choose?
When panic sets in, who knows how individuals or even ourselves will react will react.
Pam

Posts: 12176 | From: Cambridge, UK | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
cruiseny
First Class Passenger
Member # 2928

posted 05-06-2003 09:44 PM      Profile for cruiseny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by annnthony:
Princess "muster stations" indoors have been in effect for over a year...

I was on SKY PRINCESS nearly five years ago (sure doesn't feel like it!) and it was in effect.


Posts: 4730 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)
This topic is comprised of pages:  1  2  3  4 
 

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | CruisePage

Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.3

VACATION & CRUISE SPECIALS
Check out these great deals from CruisePage.com

Royal Caribbean - Bahamas Getaway from $129 per person
Description: Experience the beautiful ports of Nassau and Royal Caribbean's private island - CocoCay on a 3-night Weekend Getaway to the Bahamas. Absorb everything island life has to offer as you snorkel with the stingrays, parasail above the serene blue waters and walk the endless white sand beaches. From Miami.
Carnival - 4-Day Bahamas from $229 per person
Description: Enjoy a wonderful 3 Day cruise to the fun-loving playground of Nassau, Bahamas. Discover Nassau, the capital city as well as the cultural, commercial and financial heart of the Bahamas. Meet the Atlantic Southern Stingrays, the guardians of Blackbeard's treasure.
NCL - Bermuda - 7 Day from $499 per person
Description: What a charming little chain of islands. Walk on pink sand beaches. Swim and snorkel in turquoise seas. Take in the historical sights. They're stoically British and very quaint. Or explore the coral reefs. You can get to them by boat or propelled by fins. You pick. Freestyle Cruising doesn't tell you where to go or what to do. Sure, you can plan ahead, or decide once onboard. After all, it's your vacation. There are no deadlines or must do's.
Holland America - Eastern Caribbean from From $599 per person
Description: White sand, black sand, talcum soft or shell strewn, the beaches of the Eastern Caribbean invite you to swim, snorkel or simply relax. For shoppers, there's duty-free St. Thomas, the Straw Market in Nassau, French perfume and Dutch chocolates on St. Maarten. For history buffs, the fascinating fusion of Caribbean, Latin and European cultures. For everyone, a day spent on HAL's award winning private island Half Moon Cay.
Celebrity - 7-Night Western Mediterranean from $549 per person
Description: For centuries people have traveled to Europe to see magnificent ruins, art treasures and natural wonders. And the best way to do so is by cruise ship. Think of it - you pack and unpack only once. No wasted time searching for hotels and negotiating train stations. Instead, you arrive at romantic ports of call relaxed, refreshed and ready to take on the world.
Holland America - Alaska from From $499 per person
Description: Sail between Vancouver and Seward, departing Sundays on the ms Statendam or ms Volendam and enjoy towering mountains, actively calving glaciers and pristine wildlife habitat. Glacier Bay and College Fjord offer two completely different glacier-viewing experiences.

| Home | About Us | Suggest-a-Site | Feedback | Contact Us | Privacy |
This page, and all contents, are © 1995-2021 by Interactive Travel Guides, Inc. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved.
TravelPage.com is a trademark of Interactive Travel Guides, Inc.
Powered by TravelServer Software