Welcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.
>>> Reader Reviews >>> CruisePage.com Photo Gallery >>> Join Our Cruise Club.
Latest News...As it continues to unveil its 2027/28 lineup, Carnival Cruise Line today announced plans for three homeports as it opened new sailings in Long Beach, Calif., Norfolk, Va. and Baltimore, Md. With seasonal cruises on Carnival Legend in Long Beach, Carnival will launch its first-ever dedicated series of Hawaii cruises. Carnival is also repositioning Carnival Freedom to Norfolk and extending Carnival Pride’s...
Latest News...Oceania Cruises, the world's leading culinary- and destination-focused luxury cruise line, presents more than 230 thoughtfully curated voyages, each offering immersive experiences in some of the world's most alluring and desirable destinations. Encompassing more than a year of itineraries across seven intimate, luxurious ships, sailings range from 7 to 96 days across all seven continents...
Latest News...Today, Holland America Line announced its 2027 Canada & New England season, featuring a collection of cruises designed to showcase the region's storied national parks and rich heritage — as well as a new itinerary dedicated to the area's iconic lighthouses. In addition to exploring UNESCO World Heritage sites and vibrant cities, guests can expect a front-row seat to the region's stunning scenery...
quote:Originally posted by viking109:Little bit of a roly night through the Bay of Biscaye.
Welcome back.
Just imagine how 'roly' it might have been on a modern cruise ship!
quote:Originally posted by NAL:That's good to know....the Old Girl can lift her skirtand run with the best of them.
LOL i loved that NAL , just imagne if the british press ran the story: Queen Seen lifting skirt and running around.
quote:Originally posted by NAL:That's good to know....the Old Girl can lift her skirtand run with the best of them.....in fact much betterthan most others.Has there been any improvement in the A/C onboard? It had gotten very bad of late.....not that itever was all that wonderful.....
I can't really think of any ships in sevice that are better then her
[ 10-13-2006: Message edited by: Cunard Fan ]
quote:Originally posted by Cunard Fan:I can't really think of any ships in sevice that are better then her.
The 'Queen Mary 2', in my opinion!
quote:Originally posted by Malcolm @ cruisepage:The 'Queen Mary 2', in my opinion!
.... not to mention just about every other ship afloat!!!!
quote:Originally posted by KenC:.... not to mention just about every other ship afloat!!!!
Really you think so? Even over the Pride of America ? Personally I love the QE2, but then again I have never been on her or any other ship so for all I know your right.
Malcolm the QM2 gose with out saying. But I will say this, the QE2 has a more classic exteiror and in so ways more beautiful.
Cunard Fan, you cannot really judge a ship until you have cruised on it. Some look great and provide a mediocre experience, others look ugly, but you would have a ball.
The QE2 is like a vintage car. Most of us would probably enjoy owing one and using it at weekends, but would also like to own a modern car, with more comfort and all the mod-cons for our regular driving.
Of course the QE2 has excellent sea keeping abilities, speed (rarely required now) and loads of heritage. However in terms of comfort and facilities all modern ships beat her.
For example the QE2 is some very nasty little cabins, some with bunk beds. However, you still pay quite a lot for them. The ‘M’ grade food and service that I experienced on a crossing was the worst of any cruise ship I’ve been on, yet I paid more for it. (I appreciate that I may have just had a bad week, but never the less, that was my experience). The Grills are said to be excellent, but you normally pay through the nose for them.
I cannot regard the QE2 as good value for money.
There are two schools of though: probably half the 'Readers Reviews' (see menu left) we get think she is fantastic (Patsy will) the other half think she is overrated and over-priced. I personally will never cruise on her again, when there is so many other comfortable/better value ships.
However, having said all of the above, I do think that the Cunard ‘experience’ is a pretty unique one and worth doing, at least once.
[ 10-16-2006: Message edited by: Malcolm @ cruisepage ]
quote:Originally posted by Malcolm @ cruisepage:I have to agree with KenC. ........However, having said all of the above, I do think that the Cunard ‘experience’ is a pretty unique one and worth doing.[ 10-16-2006: Message edited by: Malcolm @ cruisepage ]
Absolutely .... I love the QM2 (we were on the maiden voyage) and am so looking forward to QV (NY to LA in 2008) ... and what about the QA in 2010 taking QE2's place????
Without doubt, a transatlantic crossing on the QE2 was a good experience for those interested in maritime history. She is very much a 'ship nuts' ship.
For those primarily interested in good accommodation, good entertainment and good food, at a reasonable price, there are many new ships with better facilities, better accommodation and certainly offering better value. You only get quality on the QE2 if you are prepared to pay top-dollar.
APPETIZER:
The trip actually started with a week in Europe visiting Holland and England. I had the fantastic pleasure of meeting cruisetalkers Onno, Cunardcoll, and SSLewis in person. Onno, Cunardcoll, and I toured the Rotterdam Maritime Museum and the Blaakse Bos. Later I introduced them to my Dutch family. Next day Onno and I met in Eindhoven, went museuming, introduced me to his family and solved the World’s design problems together.
SSLewis, Onno, his Dad, and myself met at the Southampton Maritime Museum. We saw the Ted Scull lecture. Onno presented his portfolio to the awe of all. Ted Scull called on me out of the audience to discuss the Canberra since I had sailed her before. SSLewis later drove us around Southampton and showed us the Union Castle, White Star, and Cunard buildings. SSLewis then took me to a wonderful gay bar and introduced me to a very nice chap.
FLAVOR:
I both love and hate the QE2 and Cunard at the same time. What they do well they do beautifully like no other. What they do badly the screw up royally.
CUNARD SCREW UPS:
Problems began with getting me my tickets only 6 days before my flight out, and this required 3 phone calls and a promise to post the idiocy on all the message boards. The service in the Mauritania restaurant was not fit for a Dairy Queen much less a Cunard Queen. It is the WORST I have had of any cruise. The dinner service had well meaning but incompetent waiters. On the first night I was asked to share a menu with a table mate. One waiter had BO on occasion. Lunch and breakfast service was abysmal and made NCL and Regal look really good. Orders would get screwed up, courses arrive out of sequence, and they would run out of basic items. I do have to say the food was tasty, especially the desserts. The cuisine however was not very imaginative.
Ships HVAC had 2 settings: 90^f and 30^ f with no in between.
THE SHIP:
She is a nautical Jaguar. QE2 is full of both wonderful and maddening quirks at the same time. Her exterior design is beautiful. The forms and surfaces are like the Loveboats and the RVL trio albeit enlarged. Her original interiors were done in 1966 London Mod. Over time, the mod got toned down to an interior theme which is a visual happy meal. Decor is neither innovative nor offensive. The only distinctive room is the Queens Lounge with the 1966 London Mod white fluted columns and coffered ceiling. Going between decks is another story. She has 9 stairtowers of which 8 of them go to only some decks, skip over a few, change configuration to become a habitrail so when you exit you do not know if you are going forward or aft in a hallway. It has the complexity of the New York City subway system. With 6 sea days I could figure them out if not interested in other activities. Ship had space age décor with 1920’s space planning.
She really shines like no other with her incredibly stable ride. I0’ white caps and 20 knot winds gives the gentlest of motion that helps me sleep. For 2 days we had 20’ swells where the waves would crash over the bow [saw from bridge cam, forward observation deck closed off.] the ship would gently heave, but no sound was heard. The sensation is more of pitching than rolling, like a porpoise. Unsecured closet doors would swing open and shut. I walked holding the rails, by the next day I was used to the motion and walking regularly. From the dining room to the other side, I could see the ship rock, first all sea, moving horizon, then all sky and back again, but did not feel it. The SSNorway had the same ride motions, but with more amplitude and faster frequency.
Her connection to the sea is magnificent. Every public area has an ocean view. There is no traditional enclosed promenade, but I did not miss it since that space is opened to the rest of the ship and plenty of comfortable chairs next to the windows to look out of. Most of her public rooms are smallish hideaways unlike the SSNorway and Pacific Princess which are a succession of grand spaces.
The buffet area has a line that zigzag’s in the wrong direction. There is a fence to keep you in the cattle chute, and you cannot see what is ahead to skip over food you do not want to eat. Since the dining rooms have great picture windows I did not use the buffet area. On many ships where the dining room is a windowless cavern below decks, I use the buffet simply because I like to watch the ocean while eating.
QE2 has a great sense of intimacy that I did not think could be found on a big ship. The SSNorway only 10% bigger has little sense of intimacy. Intimacy to me is a function of passenger density, not size of the ship. Regal Empress is 1/3 the size and stuffed with 1100 passengers offers none at all.
PEOPLE AND CRUISE FORMAT:
This was the BEST group of passengers I ever have been with. Crossers and cruisers are different breeds. Winter time crossers tend to be eccentric and adventurous. To want to cross the North Atlantic in the winter you have to be [me included]. Not everybody on board was wealthy, however most were well educated. Many were QE2 repeat passengers which created a sense of camaraderie and an institutional memory. All knew how to have fun. There were lots of liner loonies too. Noted travel writer Ted Scull was on board, and Stephen Card: noted maritime artist.
Some complained the weather was too calm and wanted 50 knot gales and 50’ waves. We sailed between 2 storms. The outdoor temp was 50^f most of the time and people were using the outdoor pools. The gym was crowded every morning with many seniors doing serious work outs. This ship did not have the typical red-neck, blue hair, big butt, big gut, glutton gambler cruise passenger stereotype.
Everybody on board was very friendly. If tables at tea were near full, it was OK to ask to join, and if people ask to join me I always obliged. The result was great Left Bank conversation. Pomposity and standoffishness are looked down upon.
I had been recognized as Desirod by 2 people; not by what I look like, but by certain maritime clothing and ship conversation. Internet is a small place.
Passenger complement was1000 Americans400 British90 German 40 French30 Canadianrest from all over.
The Pied Piper partial gay and lesbian charter was 25 people. I counted 100 gay people overall. We all seemed to find each other. Ages were 20-80. It was nice since we had our own section of the dining room guaranteeing good table mates. Overall it was a very low key atmosphere and everybody blended with all and not one inch of intolerance. If you told someone you were gay: "yea, there was a Tuesday last week" and continued conversation
Cunard had French and German social host/hostess's. Announcements were made in 3 languages. I found the French passengers a friendly delight and very interesting conversationally. I was told if was in France, my politics would be right of center LOL.
One was a businessman/philosopher my age. We ate breakfast every morning together and were the last to leave the dining room. British were reserved unless drunk. I ate lunch regularly with a spunky septuagenarian Glaswegian couple who were fascinating people.
The Germans traveling alone were friendly, but those in groups or couples tended to keep to themselves and not mingle. I did befriend a young lawyer. There were many singles and the age breakdown was about 75% over 60, and about 10 passengers under the age of 20. My group ran the age gamut.
A priest and a rabbi were on board. QE2 does have a synagogue. Church services were in the Theatre. One activity was a joint lecture by the priest and rabbi on people of different faiths coming together.
CAPTAIN’S PARTY AND FORMAL DRESS:
I though I would hate it, but I really don’t mind. On the QE2 there were several passengers in Scottish Kilts, one Napoleon uniform and several other vintage military outfits. If I realized I could have been creative Hmmmmmm;-) The Captains party was like a Fellini movie where the Munsters and the Addams family would blend in: taking place in the space age Queens Lounge, the bordello velour furniture, and the vintage costumes was a strange confluence.
ACTIVITIES:
The cruise format was made for me-SUPERLATIVE. Again what the QE2 does well is superlative and what it does badly is horrid. The library and book shop are second to none. It has many maritime books, and did not get a chance to finish all I wanted to read. Crossing had a Science Fiction theme which had several lectures on the Cosmic Watergate-coverups of aliens visiting Earth. Ted Scull gave two interesting lectures. Other speakers were Seth Stoshak, Max Arthur, Herbert Appleman, and Stanton Friedman. There was a classical music concert, and loved the afternoon teas with the harpist.
Overall I truly enjoyed myself. It is great to come home refreshed, showered, wearing clean clothes and not jetlagged and would definitely cross again. I can forgive the ship’s quirks, but not Cunard for simple shortcomings so easily rectified by other cruiselines.
Can't agree with you that the interiors are dull and dingey but I respect your opinion . If we all thought the same then there would only be the need for one ship design. Personally I think exterior looks are important. You have to want to sail on a ship. No matter how wonderful the Pride of America may be inside I could never get on something so damn ugly.I do agree that not many public rooms have a "wow factor" compared with say Club International or the former first class restaurant on the Norway.Certain aspects of the cruise were not perfect, but I tend to try and remain positive. Overall a great experience, but of course each to their own. Look forward to trying out QM2 sometime.
quote:Originally posted by viking109:Look forward to trying out QM2 sometime.
Personally, I see the QM2 as an updated, more high-tec and more comfortable version of the QE2.
quote:Originally posted by Patsy: We had a force 4 gale Saturday in the English Channel and force 7 yesterday leaving Guernsey and nearly fell over many times. The poor pilot boat nearly capsized several times.
[ 10-16-2006: Message edited by: greybeard ]
quote:Originally posted by Cunard Fan:So Malcom and KenC, wouldyou still go on her if you had the chance?
No, I've cruise on the QE2 once and that was enough. I'd get more for my $ on most other ships.
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.3
More Vacation & Cruise Specials...