Log In | Customer Support
Home Book Travel Destinations Hotels Cruises Air Travel Community Search:

Search

Search CruisePage

Book a Cruise
- CruiseServer
- Search Caribbean
- Search Alaska
- Search Europe
- 888.700.TRIP

Book Online
Cruise
Air
Hotel
Car
Cruising Area:

Departure Date:
Cruise Length:

Price Range:

Cruise Line:

Buy Stuff

Reviews
- Ship Reviews
- Dream Cruise
- Ship of the Month
- Reader Reviews
- Submit a Review
- Millennium Cruise

Community
- Photo Gallery
- Join Cruise Club
- Cruise News
- Cruise News Archive
- Cruise Views
- Cruise Jobs
- Special Needs
- Maritime Q & A
- Sea Stories

Industry
- New Ship Guide
- Former Ships
- Port Information
- Inspection Scores
- Shipyards
- Ship Cams
- Ship Tracking
- Freighter Travel
- Man Overboard List
- Potpourri

Shopping
- Shirts & Hats
- Books
- Videos

Contact Us
- Reservations
- Mail
- Feedback
- Suggest-a-Site
- About Us

Reader Sites
- PamM's Site
- Ernst's Site
- Patsy's Site
- Ben's Site
- Carlos' Site
- Chris' Site
- SRead's Site


Cruise Travel - Cruise Talk
Cruise Talk Cruise News

Welcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.

>>> Reader Reviews
>>> CruisePage.com Photo Gallery
>>> Join Our Cruise Club.

Latest News...Silversea has outlined its 2029 world cruise, a 125-day itinerary centered entirely on the Pacific — a region the line says remains one of the least understood and most culturally layered parts of the globe. Sailing January 5 to May 11, 2029, aboard the 392-guest Silver Whisper, A Pacific Awakening will visit more than 60 destinations across 19 countries, with 17 overnights...

Latest News...Carnival Pride is back in service in Baltimore following a 22-day dry dock in Freeport, Grand Bahama, returning with a round of updates aimed at enhancing the guest experience as the ship resumes its year-round schedule. The work marks the latest in Carnival’s ongoing fleet-refresh program, which has gradually modernized public spaces, retail venues, and entertainment areas...

Latest News...Holland America Line is preparing for the most extensive modernization effort the brand has ever undertaken, announcing a multiyear initiative that will reimagine six ships across its Vista and Signature classes. The program, called Holland America Evolution, represents more than $500 million in investment and marks the largest guest-experience update in the company’s 153-year history....

More Cruise News...


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Cruise Talk   » Ocean Liners and Classic Cruise Ships   » Rough Seas on QE2

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Rough Seas on QE2
empressport
First Class Passenger
Member # 2511

posted 04-21-2004 09:37 AM      Profile for empressport     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I'm following behind sslewis on the QE2. Very rough last night. 5 cabins flooded, 1 broken hip, and a priority 2 in the wine cellar! (I hate to think what was lost). Ship has a fair bit of motion, even today.

Tomorrow night is supposed to bring more of the rough weather. Many world cruisers onboard on the final leg of their trip. 1,200 pax, so lots of room to move around. Full review when I return home.


Posts: 464 | From: Vancouver, BC | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Malcolm @ cruisepage
Cruise Director
Member # 301

posted 04-21-2004 11:54 AM      Profile for Malcolm @ cruisepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What is a 'priority 2', please?
Posts: 19210 | From: Essex (Just Outside London) | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged
lasuvidaboy
First Class Passenger
Member # 4527

posted 04-21-2004 12:09 PM      Profile for lasuvidaboy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
If the QE2 is being tossed around that much, imagine what would happen to the big new floating boxes in the same conditions? I would rather be on QE2 with her excellent sea keeping qualities!
Posts: 7654 | From: Hollywood Hills/L.A. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Johan
First Class Passenger
Member # 4458

posted 04-21-2004 12:13 PM      Profile for Johan   Email Johan   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
QM2 is going to be late.
QE2 is having the same heavy weather conditions. Will QE2 too be too late in NYC ?
Comparisons will be made.

Posts: 1895 | From: Antwerpen, Belgium | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
sslewis
First Class Passenger
Member # 3649

posted 04-21-2004 01:28 PM      Profile for sslewis   Author's Homepage   Email sslewis   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I doubt QE2 will be late.
Her power reserve (35knots)is vastly superior to QM2 who berely reaches 30 knots.
QM2 has a roughy too, but nothing broken apart from crystal..

Posts: 2513 | From: Shipspotting Solent shores when weather allows.... | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
lasuvidaboy
First Class Passenger
Member # 4527

posted 04-21-2004 01:59 PM      Profile for lasuvidaboy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I thought that QM2 could do over 30 knots. On her trials, did'nt she just have to reach 30 knots for her to pass what she was contracted to do? On her regular 6-day crossings she is suppose to cruise at 25-26 knots, not the old service speed of 28.5 knots that the QE1, QM, QE2 did for their 5 days trips. I always preferred the 5 days trips as those extra 3 knots seemed like we were really flying along and the wake at the stern was so powerful to look at.
Posts: 7654 | From: Hollywood Hills/L.A. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Malcolm @ cruisepage
Cruise Director
Member # 301

posted 04-21-2004 05:47 PM      Profile for Malcolm @ cruisepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lasuvidaboy:
I thought that QM2 could do over 30 knots

The fact that this giant can do anything over 20 knots amazes me!

I wonder how the 'Voyager' class would do in the same storm?


Posts: 19210 | From: Essex (Just Outside London) | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged
bulbousbow
First Class Passenger
Member # 4440

posted 04-21-2004 09:55 PM      Profile for bulbousbow   Author's Homepage   Email bulbousbow   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Lasuvidaboy wrote:
If the QE2 is being tossed around that much, imagine what would happen to the big new floating boxes in the same conditions? I would rather be on QE2 with her excellent sea keeping qualities!

quote:
Malcolm wrote:
I wonder how the 'Voyager' class would do in the same storm?

Cruise ships are not meant for rough weather, their hulls and superstructures are not built for heavy seas. Their job is to steer away from such things. I guess they could probably handle 9m (30ft) waves, is that correct?

Cheers


Posts: 6866 | From: Adelaide, Australia | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged
Cunardcoll
First Class Passenger
Member # 1226

posted 04-22-2004 07:51 AM      Profile for Cunardcoll   Author's Homepage   Email Cunardcoll   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I 've heard reports from a very reliable source that QE2 and QM2 both reached 35 knots as top speed.

Jochen


Posts: 947 | From: Belgium | Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged
colt
First Class Passenger
Member # 1215

posted 04-22-2004 08:30 AM      Profile for colt     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lasuvidaboy:
If the QE2 is being tossed around that much, imagine what would happen to the big new floating boxes in the same conditions? I would rather be on QE2 with her excellent sea keeping qualities!

We were on the QE2 heading for Bermuda over Labor Day weekend many years ago. We had departed New York approximately 9 hours late, because of an approaching hurricane coming up the East Coast. We caught the tail end of the storm, and experienced a pretty rough night, but arrived in Bermuda on time without a scratch.

Two other ships also were enroute to Bermuda. One turned back to New York and the other ship experienced some sort of damage, which precluded its leaving Bermuda until repairs were made. Not a bad place to be marooned in. Not bad at all!


Posts: 293 | From: Lisbon, Maryland, USA | Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged
Brian_O
First Class Passenger
Member # 3910

posted 04-22-2004 10:04 AM      Profile for Brian_O     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Cunardcoll:
I 've heard reports from a very reliable source that QE2 and QM2 both reached 35 knots as top speed.

Jochen


35 knots? Not a chance! Methinks your source is confusing statute miles and nautical miles. 30 knots = 34.5 statute miles per hour.

QE2 reached a top speed of 35.5 knots on her March 1987 sea trials after re-engining, but that was before her Grimm Vane Wheels started disintegrating and had to be permanently removed. The loss of the vane wheels reduced her top speed. She has not approached 35 knots since then, nor has sheen been capable of doing so. Her top speed is now officially listed as 32.5 knots, although in favourable conditions she might be capable of an extra half-knot or so, but no more.

QM2 hit a shade over 30 knots for a short distance on her speed trials, but her average top speed over the measured course was 29.8 knots. The contract called for a top speed of at least 29.35 knots, so it is doubtful she could ever hit 35 knots.

Brian

Sources:
QE2 figures.....Cunard press releases in 1987.

QM2 figures....Mauricio Elizeo who was on the bridge during QM2's speed trials.


Posts: 2698 | From: Pointe-Claire, QC Canada | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
sslewis
First Class Passenger
Member # 3649

posted 04-23-2004 01:14 PM      Profile for sslewis   Author's Homepage   Email sslewis   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Considering her width and air draft, QM2 is actually not bad, and is closer to the 1930's Queens in performance than QE2.
QE2 extra speed must be due to her lightweight.
ssFrance narrower hull allowed 35 knots....
I wonder if QM2 was not pushed due to her bowthrusters doors problems?
Hoping QM2 will cross at well over 30knots, perhaps whjen she ages as the venerable ssMauretania(1907)....
A 30knot addict....

Posts: 2513 | From: Shipspotting Solent shores when weather allows.... | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
thulewx
First Class Passenger
Member # 1907

posted 04-23-2004 02:17 PM      Profile for thulewx   Email thulewx   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
What was the top speed of the SSUS? I thought I remembered seeing something about 40 knots. I also remember one of the QM2 staff saying something about short term "burst" speed that they could do in emergencies... but he wouldn't give details.
Posts: 140 | From: Unadilla, Georgia | Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
BigUFan
First Class Passenger
Member # 1382

posted 04-23-2004 03:10 PM      Profile for BigUFan   Author's Homepage   Email BigUFan   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
43 to be exact. Also, 20+ in reverse. I don't remember the exact figure for reverse. I think it was 25 or 28.
Posts: 904 | From: Orlando, FL | Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Barryboat
First Class Passenger
Member # 33

posted 04-23-2004 04:55 PM      Profile for Barryboat   Author's Homepage   Email Barryboat   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Big U Fan,

I spoke to one of the original designers of Big U who was onboard during trials and he revealed the ship maxed-out at 48 knots. (Which was the closely guarded secret speed)


Posts: 1851 | From: Bloomington, Minnesota (Home to the Mall of America) | Registered: Mar 99  |  IP: Logged
empressport
First Class Passenger
Member # 2511

posted 04-26-2004 08:40 PM      Profile for empressport     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Back in Vancouver after an eventful crossing. The day after my original e-mail was the most eventful. Force 10 winds and 11 metre waves. Adding to that, the swells were steep and close so QE2 was really climbing the wave and crashing down the other side. My cabin 4006 was well forward, and pitching quite a lot.

Had a chance to see both Queens from Battery Park as they departed. Sad to say the QM2 looks very much the cruise ship, all flood-lit and mauve lights highliting the mast and ventilators!!! Judging from this and comments heard onboard QE2, Cunard may be alienating their loyal clientele.

I'll do a full review later. Right now, I've still got the sea-sway going on!


Posts: 464 | From: Vancouver, BC | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
lasuvidaboy
First Class Passenger
Member # 4527

posted 04-27-2004 12:39 AM      Profile for lasuvidaboy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Captain Warwick was interviewed live from QM2 on Peter Greenberg's travel show on KABC radio (Los Angeles) on Sunday and said in the interview that QM2 used her additional power to make up for the weather delay. He said that he slowed her down to 17 knots when the storm was at it's peak and powered her up to 29+ knots to make up for the delay and reach NYC on time. QM2's regular transatlantic service speed is 26 knots for the 6- day trip as opposed to the old 28.5 knots for the 5- day crossing that the previous three Queen liners traveled at.
Posts: 7654 | From: Hollywood Hills/L.A. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
PamM
First Class Passenger
Member # 2127

posted 04-27-2004 09:13 AM      Profile for PamM   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Brian_O:
...... but that was before her Grimm Vane Wheels started disintegrating and had to be permanently removed.

Sources:
QE2 figures.....Cunard press releases in 1987.


Curious here.... in one of JMG's lectures he related that these vanes did indeed improve the performance on the trials, but on return to the yard, when the divers went down for insepction, they'd gone! "Lost at Sea" pulled off with the force of her propellors, never refitted.

This makes out she never actually sailed with them, whereas the Cunard statement above indicates that they at least lasted some length of time?

Pam


Posts: 12176 | From: Cambridge, UK | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
PamM
First Class Passenger
Member # 2127

posted 04-27-2004 09:24 AM      Profile for PamM   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
At least someone has the right detail lasuvidaboy I have read in so many places about being late, delayed etc.. but we arrived exactly at the times indicated at the beginning of the voyage. But it wasn't actually confimed that we would, until the last evening.
We did slow to 17kts and rumours flew around about engine trouble <sigh>.. why is everyone always on the pessimistic side, the weather was bad, not the engines. I think people are dying for the pods to blow up, fall off, crack and be irrepairable to say "I told you so"
We did have a code bravo called, and duty staff to report to somewhere I forget, early in the voyage, but all clear after 10 mins, no idea to what it related, never heard any gossip about it either.

Glad you had a good trip empressport, nice & rough.. look forward to the review.

Pam


Posts: 12176 | From: Cambridge, UK | Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
empressport
First Class Passenger
Member # 2511

posted 04-27-2004 10:34 AM      Profile for empressport     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
We had a code bravo on QE2 as well. I belive it means smoke or fire, as Capt. McNaught later explained a bearing somewhere near the Lido had been smoking.
Posts: 464 | From: Vancouver, BC | Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Brian_O
First Class Passenger
Member # 3910

posted 04-27-2004 02:29 PM      Profile for Brian_O     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by PamM:

Curious here.... in one of JMG's lectures he related that these vanes did indeed improve the performance on the trials, but on return to the yard, when the divers went down for insepction, they'd gone! "Lost at Sea" pulled off with the force of her propellors, never refitted.


Based on press releases, news reports and reports in the trade press at the time plus coversations I had with on-board personnel (including engineering officers) later in the year ( 1987), I'd have to say JMG has his facts wrong.

As far as I have read and been told, the first problems with the vane wheels occurred on the voyage back to Southampton in April 1987 after the refit. After a demonstration manoeuvre it became obvious that something had gone wrong, so once the ship reached Southampton divers were sent down to inspect for damage. The divers found that some blades had broken off the vane wheels and they were ordered to balance the wheels by cutting off a few more blades. When QE2 reached New York more blades were found to be damaged and more cutting was done. Finally when QE2 returned to Southampton, the remaining blades were cut off.

Brian

[ 04-27-2004: Message edited by: Brian_O ]


Posts: 2698 | From: Pointe-Claire, QC Canada | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
chrisrotlmacin
First Class Passenger
Member # 4531

posted 04-27-2004 03:38 PM      Profile for chrisrotlmacin   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Can be worst than that. This picture was taken on cross Atlantic with huricane Isabel falowing us. He miss us but he hit Halifax last year.

[ 04-27-2004: Message edited by: chrisrotlmacin ]


Posts: 233 | From: Romania ,the home country of Dracula and with the best cruise crew in the world | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | CruisePage

Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.3

VACATION & CRUISE SPECIALS
Check out these great deals from CruisePage.com

Royal Caribbean - Bahamas Getaway from $129 per person
Description: Experience the beautiful ports of Nassau and Royal Caribbean's private island - CocoCay on a 3-night Weekend Getaway to the Bahamas. Absorb everything island life has to offer as you snorkel with the stingrays, parasail above the serene blue waters and walk the endless white sand beaches. From Miami.
Carnival - 4-Day Bahamas from $229 per person
Description: Enjoy a wonderful 3 Day cruise to the fun-loving playground of Nassau, Bahamas. Discover Nassau, the capital city as well as the cultural, commercial and financial heart of the Bahamas. Meet the Atlantic Southern Stingrays, the guardians of Blackbeard's treasure.
NCL - Bermuda - 7 Day from $499 per person
Description: What a charming little chain of islands. Walk on pink sand beaches. Swim and snorkel in turquoise seas. Take in the historical sights. They're stoically British and very quaint. Or explore the coral reefs. You can get to them by boat or propelled by fins. You pick. Freestyle Cruising doesn't tell you where to go or what to do. Sure, you can plan ahead, or decide once onboard. After all, it's your vacation. There are no deadlines or must do's.
Holland America - Eastern Caribbean from From $599 per person
Description: White sand, black sand, talcum soft or shell strewn, the beaches of the Eastern Caribbean invite you to swim, snorkel or simply relax. For shoppers, there's duty-free St. Thomas, the Straw Market in Nassau, French perfume and Dutch chocolates on St. Maarten. For history buffs, the fascinating fusion of Caribbean, Latin and European cultures. For everyone, a day spent on HAL's award winning private island Half Moon Cay.
Celebrity - 7-Night Western Mediterranean from $549 per person
Description: For centuries people have traveled to Europe to see magnificent ruins, art treasures and natural wonders. And the best way to do so is by cruise ship. Think of it - you pack and unpack only once. No wasted time searching for hotels and negotiating train stations. Instead, you arrive at romantic ports of call relaxed, refreshed and ready to take on the world.
Holland America - Alaska from From $499 per person
Description: Sail between Vancouver and Seward, departing Sundays on the ms Statendam or ms Volendam and enjoy towering mountains, actively calving glaciers and pristine wildlife habitat. Glacier Bay and College Fjord offer two completely different glacier-viewing experiences.

| Home | About Us | Suggest-a-Site | Feedback | Contact Us | Privacy |
This page, and all contents, are � 1995-2021 by Interactive Travel Guides, Inc. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved.
TravelPage.com is a trademark of Interactive Travel Guides, Inc.
Powered by