Welcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.
>>> Reader Reviews >>> CruisePage.com Photo Gallery >>> Join Our Cruise Club.
Latest News...Silversea has outlined its 2029 world cruise, a 125-day itinerary centered entirely on the Pacific — a region the line says remains one of the least understood and most culturally layered parts of the globe. Sailing January 5 to May 11, 2029, aboard the 392-guest Silver Whisper, A Pacific Awakening will visit more than 60 destinations across 19 countries, with 17 overnights...
Latest News...Carnival Pride is back in service in Baltimore following a 22-day dry dock in Freeport, Grand Bahama, returning with a round of updates aimed at enhancing the guest experience as the ship resumes its year-round schedule. The work marks the latest in Carnival’s ongoing fleet-refresh program, which has gradually modernized public spaces, retail venues, and entertainment areas...
Latest News...Holland America Line is preparing for the most extensive modernization effort the brand has ever undertaken, announcing a multiyear initiative that will reimagine six ships across its Vista and Signature classes. The program, called Holland America Evolution, represents more than $500 million in investment and marks the largest guest-experience update in the company’s 153-year history....
Tomorrow night is supposed to bring more of the rough weather. Many world cruisers onboard on the final leg of their trip. 1,200 pax, so lots of room to move around. Full review when I return home.
quote:Originally posted by lasuvidaboy:I thought that QM2 could do over 30 knots
The fact that this giant can do anything over 20 knots amazes me!
I wonder how the 'Voyager' class would do in the same storm?
quote:Lasuvidaboy wrote:If the QE2 is being tossed around that much, imagine what would happen to the big new floating boxes in the same conditions? I would rather be on QE2 with her excellent sea keeping qualities!
quote:Malcolm wrote:I wonder how the 'Voyager' class would do in the same storm?
Cruise ships are not meant for rough weather, their hulls and superstructures are not built for heavy seas. Their job is to steer away from such things. I guess they could probably handle 9m (30ft) waves, is that correct?
Cheers
Jochen
quote:Originally posted by lasuvidaboy:If the QE2 is being tossed around that much, imagine what would happen to the big new floating boxes in the same conditions? I would rather be on QE2 with her excellent sea keeping qualities!
We were on the QE2 heading for Bermuda over Labor Day weekend many years ago. We had departed New York approximately 9 hours late, because of an approaching hurricane coming up the East Coast. We caught the tail end of the storm, and experienced a pretty rough night, but arrived in Bermuda on time without a scratch.
Two other ships also were enroute to Bermuda. One turned back to New York and the other ship experienced some sort of damage, which precluded its leaving Bermuda until repairs were made. Not a bad place to be marooned in. Not bad at all!
quote:Originally posted by Cunardcoll:I 've heard reports from a very reliable source that QE2 and QM2 both reached 35 knots as top speed.Jochen
35 knots? Not a chance! Methinks your source is confusing statute miles and nautical miles. 30 knots = 34.5 statute miles per hour.
QE2 reached a top speed of 35.5 knots on her March 1987 sea trials after re-engining, but that was before her Grimm Vane Wheels started disintegrating and had to be permanently removed. The loss of the vane wheels reduced her top speed. She has not approached 35 knots since then, nor has sheen been capable of doing so. Her top speed is now officially listed as 32.5 knots, although in favourable conditions she might be capable of an extra half-knot or so, but no more.
QM2 hit a shade over 30 knots for a short distance on her speed trials, but her average top speed over the measured course was 29.8 knots. The contract called for a top speed of at least 29.35 knots, so it is doubtful she could ever hit 35 knots.
Brian
Sources: QE2 figures.....Cunard press releases in 1987.
QM2 figures....Mauricio Elizeo who was on the bridge during QM2's speed trials.
I spoke to one of the original designers of Big U who was onboard during trials and he revealed the ship maxed-out at 48 knots. (Which was the closely guarded secret speed)
Had a chance to see both Queens from Battery Park as they departed. Sad to say the QM2 looks very much the cruise ship, all flood-lit and mauve lights highliting the mast and ventilators!!! Judging from this and comments heard onboard QE2, Cunard may be alienating their loyal clientele.
I'll do a full review later. Right now, I've still got the sea-sway going on!
quote:Originally posted by Brian_O:...... but that was before her Grimm Vane Wheels started disintegrating and had to be permanently removed. Sources: QE2 figures.....Cunard press releases in 1987.
Curious here.... in one of JMG's lectures he related that these vanes did indeed improve the performance on the trials, but on return to the yard, when the divers went down for insepction, they'd gone! "Lost at Sea" pulled off with the force of her propellors, never refitted.
This makes out she never actually sailed with them, whereas the Cunard statement above indicates that they at least lasted some length of time?
Pam
Glad you had a good trip empressport, nice & rough.. look forward to the review.
quote:Originally posted by PamM:Curious here.... in one of JMG's lectures he related that these vanes did indeed improve the performance on the trials, but on return to the yard, when the divers went down for insepction, they'd gone! "Lost at Sea" pulled off with the force of her propellors, never refitted.
Based on press releases, news reports and reports in the trade press at the time plus coversations I had with on-board personnel (including engineering officers) later in the year ( 1987), I'd have to say JMG has his facts wrong.
As far as I have read and been told, the first problems with the vane wheels occurred on the voyage back to Southampton in April 1987 after the refit. After a demonstration manoeuvre it became obvious that something had gone wrong, so once the ship reached Southampton divers were sent down to inspect for damage. The divers found that some blades had broken off the vane wheels and they were ordered to balance the wheels by cutting off a few more blades. When QE2 reached New York more blades were found to be damaged and more cutting was done. Finally when QE2 returned to Southampton, the remaining blades were cut off.
[ 04-27-2004: Message edited by: Brian_O ]
[ 04-27-2004: Message edited by: chrisrotlmacin ]
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.3
More Vacation & Cruise Specials...