Welcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.
>>> Reader Reviews >>> CruisePage.com Photo Gallery >>> Join Our Cruise Club.
Latest News...Royal Caribbean Group (NYSE: RCL) today reported third quarter Earnings per Share ("EPS") of $5.74 and Adjusted EPS of $5.75. These results were better than the company's guidance primarily due to higher than expected close-in demand and lower costs. The company is raising its full year 2025 Adjusted EPS guidance to $15.58 to $15.63, representing 32% year-over-year growth. This increase...
Latest News...Oceania Cruises, the world's leading culinary- and destination-focused luxury cruise line, invites travelers to experience the ultimate global journey aboard the luxurious Oceania Vista during its 2027 Around the World cruise. In addition to options ranging from 127 days to more than eight months, the once-in-a-lifetime 244-day voyage has been thoughtfully divided into 17 immersive...
Latest News...Royal Caribbean Group is bringing the ultimate day to Santorini. Set to open in summer 2026, Royal Beach Club Santorini will welcome vacationers from Royal Caribbean and Celebrity Cruises and combine the breathtaking volcanic beaches of this iconic Greek island with the company's signature experiences alongside the vibrant Grecian spirit and culture to create the ultimate Santorini..
[ 10-22-2007: Message edited by: Jamaica Jeff ]
quote:Originally posted by Jamaica Jeff:With all the talk of its demise, why does NCLA not mix up its cruises and base a ship out of L.A. or San Diego and do longer cruises like the ones Princess offers? And could they not send the ships to Alaska in the summer?
Maybe they should squeeze in some other itineraries from time to time. Nevertheless, the whole point of having an U.S. registered ship is of course to be able to offer cruises in Hawaii without having to go to a foreign port in e.g. Mexico or Canada.
Alaska, the Caribbean and any U.S. Coastwise trade are expressly prohibited.
Unfortunately, that means that NCLA is pretty much locked into the Hawaiian Island trades and this is the reason they wanted the SS US as she COULD undertake any of the other routes.
Tim
quote:Originally posted by Jamaica Jeff:OK so Alaska is out, but can,t they do Hawaii from Southern Cal, or S.F.? Still Hawaii and still U.S. ports.
Anyhow, why would someone choose one of these for, say, an LA-Hawaii cruise? Just to avoid the short "technical stop" in Ensenada? I imagine most people would rather take a "regular" ship.
quote:Originally posted by dougnewman:Anyhow, why would someone choose one of these for, say, an LA-Hawaii cruise? Just to avoid the short "technical stop" in Ensenada? I imagine most people would rather take a "regular" ship.
They would be able to do a one-way rather than the required round trip. Useful for those living in Hawaii for vacations to the US and for those wishing to maybe spend time on the islands without having to fly.
Pam
quote:Originally posted by Tim in 'Lauderdale:Unfortunately, that means that NCLA is pretty much locked into the Hawaiian Island trades and this is the reason they wanted the SS US as she COULD undertake any of the other routes.
You have confused me now Tim. Can't regular NCL ships cruise from LA to Hawaii as Princess etc. do? What coulkd the SS United States do they NCLA ships could not?
So is the NCLA 'dream' nearly over?
quote:Originally posted by dougnewman:I'm sure Tim knows better but I don't think the ships are allowed to call at any ports outside Hawaii, and certainly not to start and end cruises there.Anyhow, why would someone choose one of these for, say, an LA-Hawaii cruise? Just to avoid the short "technical stop" in Ensenada? I imagine most people would rather take a "regular" ship.
Doug,
IIRC, I did the math once and each ship could do @ one round-trip Hawaii-Cali sailing each quarter without violating the exemptions.
quote:Originally posted by Malcolm @ cruisepage:You have confused me now Tim. Can't regular NCL ships cruise from LA to Hawaii as Princess etc. do? What coulkd the SS United States do they NCLA ships could not?So is the NCLA 'dream' nearly over?
Malcolm,
yes they can, but those Hawaii voyages from the west coast are expensive to operate because of the vast amount of fuel required as the ships spend 10 out of 15 days cruising at close to maximum speed.
With the cost of fuel approaching $500/metric ton, I think you'll see the offering of those voyages by the likes of Princess, HAL and Celebrity being scaled back.
quote:Originally posted by Tim in 'Lauderdale:With the cost of fuel approaching $500/metric ton, I think you'll see the offering of those voyages by the likes of Princess, HAL and Celebrity being scaled back.
..which reduces NCLA's competition, would it not.
Tim, I'm still not clear what the SS United States role might have been.
For a Brit, taking a long haul to LA, then another expensive flight to Hawaii for an NCLA cruise, would cost more than the cruise itself. I like the idea of cruing from the US mainland.
So is NCLA on it's last legs?
[ 10-23-2007: Message edited by: Malcolm @ cruisepage ]
quote:Originally posted by Malcolm @ cruisepage:..which reduces NCLA's competition, would it not.Tim, I'm still not clear what the SS United States role might have been.For a Brit, taking a long haul to LA, then another expensive flight to Hawaii for an NCLA cruise, would cost more than the cruise itself. I like the idea of cruing from the US mainland.So is NCLA on it's last legs?[ 10-23-2007: Message edited by: Malcolm @ cruisepage ]
Malcom,
As I understand it the current NCLA ships in Hawaii are required to stay there however the SSUS and Indy are not bound by that in the exemption they recieved. Here is a link if you want to read the exemption
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04421.pdf
The bit that covers restrictions is on page 13-14
quote:Originally posted by PamM:They would be able to do a one-way rather than the required round trip. Useful for those living in Hawaii for vacations to the US and for those wishing to maybe spend time on the islands without having to fly.
(Rather a pity, though, that nobody does a passenger-cargo service to Hawaii, don't you think? What with all the container traffic that goes between the US and Hawaii, it's too bad the ships don't carry passengers. At least as far as I know none do, anyway.)
quote:Originally posted by Malcolm @ cruisepage:Can't regular NCL ships cruise from LA to Hawaii as Princess etc. do?
quote:Originally posted by Malcolm @ cruisepage:What coulkd the SS United States do they NCLA ships could not?
quote:Originally posted by Malcolm @ cruisepage:So is the NCLA 'dream' nearly over?
quote:Originally posted by Tim in 'Lauderdale:IIRC, I did the math once and each ship could do @ one round-trip Hawaii-Cali sailing each quarter without violating the exemptions.
quote:Originally posted by dougnewman:(Rather a pity, though, that nobody does a passenger-cargo service to Hawaii, don't you think? What with all the container traffic that goes between the US and Hawaii, it's too bad the ships don't carry passengers. At least as far as I know none do, anyway.)
I am not sure whether you could embark/disembark in Hawaii - but I know someone who had a stop in Hawaii during a cargo ship trip. (as passenger)
Since they are of US registry if they did have a few passenger cabins onboard I assume they could transport passengers between point A and B.
America-Hawaii Cruises sold crossings (they had themes such as a 'Big Band' crossing) on the Independence and Constitution when these ships returned to S.F. for repairs.
I am only a novice, but why doesn't NCL just position a ship at Hawaii year round and do their 10 night/11 night Hawaiian island cruises which include Kiribati? We have done this cruise twice and it is a great cruise. Not only do you see all the islands but you also have 4 days at sea and don't forget Kiribati - a beautiful unspoilt island that will probably disappear because of global warming.
The Norwegian Wind was to be replaced by the Norwegian Sun on this route so bring back the Norwegian Sun and see how it goes. The 7 night cruise is too "busy" as you are in a port every day.
[ 10-23-2007: Message edited by: PamM ]
quote:Originally posted by PamM:Some people moaned and groaned endlessly about the required side trip to Fanning Island, with the 'boring' sea days Pam[ 10-23-2007: Message edited by: PamM ]
I understand it is approx. a 2000 mile (round trip) side trip to Fanning from Hawaii. That burns quite a bit of fuel for a 'service call'.
quote:Originally posted by timb:[QB]Here is a link if you want to read the exemption
Thanks Timb, not exactly light reading, but what a facinating document.
quote:Originally posted by mike sa:I recall that PO America will continue to do the 7 day round trip next year after PO Hawaii is moved to Europe, PO Aloha will then do 10 and 11 day sialings including the trip out to Kirimbati.
Makes sense to remove one ship and place another on a slightly different itinerary. I wonder if NCLA will be down to one ship as America-Hawaii was after the retirement of Constitution back in 1995?
quote:Originally posted by lasuvidaboy:I wonder if NCLA will be down to one ship as America-Hawaii was after the retirement of Constitution back in 1995?
quote:Originally posted by lasuvidaboy: I wonder if NCLA will be down to one ship as America-Hawaii was after the retirement of Constitution back in 1995?
I recall that many of us cruise-talkers were surprised that NCLA could fill three reasonably large ships week in week out. Obviously they can't now.
It's all rather unfortunate for NCL/A. They engineered what they though was a monopoly, yet have still struggled to make it pay.
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.3
More Vacation & Cruise Specials...