Log In | Customer Support
Home Book Travel Destinations Hotels Cruises Air Travel Community Search:

Search

Search CruisePage

Book a Cruise
- CruiseServer
- Search Caribbean
- Search Alaska
- Search Europe
- 888.700.TRIP

Book Online
Cruise
Air
Hotel
Car
Cruising Area:

Departure Date:
Cruise Length:

Price Range:

Cruise Line:

Buy Stuff

Reviews
- Ship Reviews
- Dream Cruise
- Ship of the Month
- Reader Reviews
- Submit a Review
- Millennium Cruise

Community
- Photo Gallery
- Join Cruise Club
- Cruise News
- Cruise News Archive
- Cruise Views
- Cruise Jobs
- Special Needs
- Maritime Q & A
- Sea Stories

Industry
- New Ship Guide
- Former Ships
- Port Information
- Inspection Scores
- Shipyards
- Ship Cams
- Ship Tracking
- Freighter Travel
- Man Overboard List
- Potpourri

Shopping
- Shirts & Hats
- Books
- Videos

Contact Us
- Reservations
- Mail
- Feedback
- Suggest-a-Site
- About Us

Reader Sites
- PamM's Site
- Ernst's Site
- Patsy's Site
- Ben's Site
- Carlos' Site
- Chris' Site
- SRead's Site


Cruise Travel - Cruise Talk
Cruise Talk Cruise News

Welcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.

>>> Reader Reviews
>>> CruisePage.com Photo Gallery
>>> Join Our Cruise Club.

Latest News...Holland America Line will expand its presence in Europe with year-round operations for the first time, introducing a winter and early-spring program for the 2027–2028 season. The move positions the line to offer a broader range of itineraries beyond the traditional summer months, with Nieuw Statendam remaining in Europe throughout the winter and Zuiderdam adding two additional seasonal voyages...

Latest News...Princess Cruises has outlined its most extensive Europe program to date, announcing 291 departures across 150 itineraries for the 2028 season. Six ships will operate throughout Northern Europe, the Mediterranean and on transatlantic routes, marking the line’s largest-ever deployment in the region. The 2028 program, now open for booking, spans voyages from seven to 53 days and includes...

Latest News...Carnival Cruise Line has completed a major expansion of RelaxAway, its exclusive destination on Half Moon Cay, adding new beachfront space, upgraded amenities and improved access for guests. The enhancements were formally marked with a ribbon-cutting ceremony as the line prepares to bring more ships to the private island. The project includes an extended stretch of white-sand beach, additional complimentary...

More Cruise News...


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Cruise Talk   » Cruise Lines   » Cunard might build a QUEEN ANNE.... (Page 1)

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!  
This topic is comprised of pages:  1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Cunard might build a QUEEN ANNE....
Waynaro
First Class Passenger
Member # 3484

posted 05-07-2004 11:51 PM      Profile for Waynaro   Email Waynaro   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
In a different forum there was a guy who recently came back from a 17 nights cruise on the QM2 this is what he told me:
quote:
Cunard has not announced a Queen Anne, however, on my 17-day voyager on the QM2, Pamela Conover (President of Cunard) personally told me that there will be another ship, however, no contract has been signed and no order has been placed. Also, on the last night of the cruise, the cruise director said, "We hope to see you onboard another Cunard ship in the future, whether it is the QE2, QM2, QV, or Queen Anne..." and then he told us a little about it (improved version of QM2, maybe smaller). It is still a rumor, because there have been no official press statements. However, the President of Cunard and the cruise director of the greatest ship ever to exist have both verified that there will indeed be another ship.
What do you guys think?

Posts: 6108 | From: Vallejo,CA : California Maritime Academy!!! | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
CGT
First Class Passenger
Member # 3531

posted 05-08-2004 12:23 AM      Profile for CGT        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well I wait with bated breath.
Posts: 2760 | From: New York, New York, USA | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
lasuvidaboy
First Class Passenger
Member # 4527

posted 05-08-2004 01:46 AM      Profile for lasuvidaboy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How many 'Queen' names are they planning on using?? Queen Anne sounds a little silly. How about Caronia, Aquitania, Mauretania etc. Cunard could build a large fleet and have not have problems coming up with names from their prior list of ships.
Posts: 7654 | From: Hollywood Hills/L.A. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Ðraikar
First Class Passenger
Member # 1153

posted 05-08-2004 02:16 AM      Profile for Ðraikar   Email Ðraikar   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
QM2 is doing good so why not more clone's of her !!!!
All the other cruise lines do it....

Ask some in the cruise business and they say why not if its profitable, or in other words "DUH me make more coins DERR" LoL its true


Posts: 1710 | From: USA, New York | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged
Brian_O
First Class Passenger
Member # 3910

posted 05-08-2004 02:26 AM      Profile for Brian_O     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lasuvidaboy:
Queen Anne sounds a little silly.

Why? Queen Anne was the last monarch of the Stuart dynasty and the fifth of England's seven (to date) Queens. It's a legitimate choice. Also, the Queen Anne suite was one of the original penthouse suites on QE2, so the name already has a Cunard tradition.

Now Queen Jane would have been a bit silly, given that she reigned for only 9 days before being deposed and replaced by "Bloody" Mary (Henry VIII's oldest daughter).

Brian


Posts: 2698 | From: Pointe-Claire, QC Canada | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Waynaro
First Class Passenger
Member # 3484

posted 05-08-2004 02:28 AM      Profile for Waynaro   Email Waynaro   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Well I think it would be cool to see the Cunard fleet to have similar ships, but I do wonder economically can Cunard fill 2 QM2-sized ships? I don't mind a smaller QM2, but a exact duplicate QM2 NOOOOO !

Names they should use:
1. Queen Caronia
2. Queen Antonia


Posts: 6108 | From: Vallejo,CA : California Maritime Academy!!! | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Brian_O
First Class Passenger
Member # 3910

posted 05-08-2004 02:41 AM      Profile for Brian_O     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Keitaro:

Names they should use:
1. Queen Caronia
2. Queen Antonia

If they are going to use "Queen" names, they should be legitmate names and not phony ones a la Princess Cruises (e.g. Princess Carla, Princess Italia).

Brian

[ 05-08-2004: Message edited by: Brian_O ]


Posts: 2698 | From: Pointe-Claire, QC Canada | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Ðraikar
First Class Passenger
Member # 1153

posted 05-08-2004 03:12 AM      Profile for Ðraikar   Email Ðraikar   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Brian_O:

If they are going to use "Queen" names, they should be legitmate names and not phony ones a la Princess Cruises (e.g. Princess Carla, Princess Italia).

Brian

[ 05-08-2004: Message edited by: Brian_O ]


How about "Queen Clone" she would be a clone of the largest ship built by man, the "LARGEST CLONE built by the hand of man" too....


Posts: 1710 | From: USA, New York | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged
Guest
First Class Passenger
Member # 1157

posted 05-08-2004 03:22 AM      Profile for Guest        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I doubt Queen Anne would be seen before QV who isnt due till 2007. By that time regardless of her name we would be used to it.

I like the fact we have two Queens, but it is sad to part from the "ia" ending for newbuilds. Caronia, Mauretania, Aquitania, Saxonia... all are more traditionally Cunard then a 3rd and 4th Queen.


Posts: 1888 | From: Earth | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged
Maasdam
First Class Passenger
Member # 3858

posted 05-08-2004 04:41 AM      Profile for Maasdam   Author's Homepage   Email Maasdam   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Iff it's true i think Cunard must stick to there past as HAL, HAPAG, P & O dith with naming there ships.
Such beautiffull names as Carpathia, Maurentania, Lusitania, Beregania etc. Buth iff they will go forward with Queen names i think after Queen Elizabeth 1 and 2, Queen Mary 1 and 2, Queen Victoria. Maybe Queen Anne. Think Queen Alexandria would be a very beautifful name fore a ship. She will named after the wife off King Edward son off Queen Victoria.

You may say buth she was not a ranging Queen. So Queen Mary and Queen Elizabeth also not.

The QE2 was not named after Elizabeth the second buth after the first ship the QE off 1940. The QM2 was named after the Queen Mary off 1936

[ 05-08-2004: Message edited by: Maasdam ]


Posts: 4695 | From: Rotterdam home of the tss. Rotterdam. | Registered: May 2003  |  IP: Logged
Malcolm @ cruisepage
Cruise Director
Member # 301

posted 05-08-2004 06:22 AM      Profile for Malcolm @ cruisepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
on the last night of the cruise, the cruise director said, "We hope to see you onboard another Cunard ship in the future, whether it is the QE2, QM2, QV, or Queen Anne..."

On my recent QM2 cruise, the Cruise director said at the end of the a show, something like "Cunard will be building another QM2".

Personally, I do not regard him as a reliable souce. I doubt if he has a direct line to Pamela Conover?

I had luch with the third officer onboard (now the second officer!) and he knew nothing of Cunard's future ship building plans, apart from what we all know.


Posts: 19210 | From: Essex (Just Outside London) | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged
RobHolland
First Class Passenger
Member # 3779

posted 05-08-2004 07:49 AM      Profile for RobHolland   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Could it be possible that that was posted at April Fools Day? Why would Pamela Conover announce something like that to 'just' a passenger, knowing what rumours it may cause. Ofcourse there will be other Cunard ships coming up in the future. Pretty strange when a passenger would know more than a 2nd officer.
Posts: 762 | From: ms Rotterdam | Registered: Apr 2003  |  IP: Logged
Waynaro
First Class Passenger
Member # 3484

posted 05-08-2004 03:03 PM      Profile for Waynaro   Email Waynaro   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Brian_O:

If they are going to use "Queen" names, they should be legitmate names and not phony ones a la Princess Cruises (e.g. Princess Carla, Princess Italia).


Brian, both ANTONIA and CARONIA are names of Cunard's former and current ships.

Posts: 6108 | From: Vallejo,CA : California Maritime Academy!!! | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
Brian_O
First Class Passenger
Member # 3910

posted 05-08-2004 07:00 PM      Profile for Brian_O     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Keitaro:
Brian, both ANTONIA and CARONIA are names of Cunard's former and current ships.

But they are not the names of British Queens, regnant or consort. The names would be artificial Queens rather than the names of real historical women.

The 7 Queens Regnant of England were/are, in chronological order: Jane, Mary, Elizabeth, Mary II, Anne, Victoria and Elizabeth II. Of these only Victoria has had a Cunard ship named after her. However, naming a ship after either of the Mary's or Elizabeth's at this time would be confusing, hence the name Anne. Of course the list of Queens Consort is much longer.

QM and QE were named after the Queens Consort to George V and George VI respectively. Both were real women. QE2 and QM2 are named after their like-named predecessors in the Cunard fleet which were named after real women, so the connection to the monarchy is there, albeit indirectly.

The suggestion of Queen Alexandra, Queen Consort to Edward VII is also a good one. Besides being the mother of George V, she was also an aunt of Nicholas II of Russia, but we won't hold that against her.

If you want a "Queen" named after both a former Cunard ship and a former English Queen, Queen Berengaria would fit the bill since she was Queen Consort to Richard the Lionheart.

The list of legitimate real names to choose from is long enough without resorting to manufacturing artificial ones.

Brian


Posts: 2698 | From: Pointe-Claire, QC Canada | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Beezo
First Class Passenger
Member # 1505

posted 05-08-2004 07:46 PM      Profile for Beezo   Author's Homepage   Email Beezo   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Brian_O:

The 7 Queens Regnant of England were/are, in chronological order: Jane, Mary, Elizabeth, Mary II, Anne, Victoria and Elizabeth II. Of these only Victoria has had a Cunard ship named after her. However, naming a ship after either of the Mary's or Elizabeth's at this time would be confusing, hence the name Anne. Of course the list of Queens Consort is much longer.

so wait, there was a ship named Queen Victoria already, or am I just reading this in correctly? b/c then wouldn't it really be QV2?

~Brian


Posts: 865 | From: Massachusetts, USA | Registered: Aug 2000  |  IP: Logged
lasuvidaboy
First Class Passenger
Member # 4527

posted 05-08-2004 09:23 PM      Profile for lasuvidaboy     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Cunard did'nt have a 'Queen' liner for their first 100 years or so. The Queen liners were originally the top tier of the line after 1936. In my opinion, Cunard could end up like HAL whith their "dam' naming system and start making up names begining with Queen this and Queen that. Queen Victoria should be the next LINERS' name and Cunard could start using 'ia' ending names from their illustrious past for all future cruise ships. Hopefully Cunard will have many ships in the future. This is of course my humble opinion. P.S. 'Queen Nancy' and 'Queen Jackie' would be nice to honor Nancy Reagan and Jackie Kennedy since Cunard is now an Americam owned line-hehe
Posts: 7654 | From: Hollywood Hills/L.A. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged
Brian_O
First Class Passenger
Member # 3910

posted 05-08-2004 11:25 PM      Profile for Brian_O     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Beezo:

so wait, there was a ship named Queen Victoria already, or am I just reading this in correctly? b/c then wouldn't it really be QV2?

~Brian


No. There has not as yet been a Queen Victoria in the Cunard fleet, but the name has been assigned (and reaasigned) to Cunard's next ship coming out of the Fincantieri yards. That will be the first Cunarder named after a British Monarch (as opposed to a Queen Consort).

Brian


Brian

[ 05-09-2004: Message edited by: Brian_O ]


Posts: 2698 | From: Pointe-Claire, QC Canada | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
RANGERVR6178
First Class Passenger
Member # 3946

posted 05-08-2004 11:35 PM      Profile for RANGERVR6178   Email RANGERVR6178   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Wayne, I dont like whoever posted that idea.

But I guess since he was told from Pamela, he IS RIGHT!!!


Posts: 243 | From: Sarasota, Florida | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Brian_O
First Class Passenger
Member # 3910

posted 05-08-2004 11:56 PM      Profile for Brian_O     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by lasuvidaboy:
Cunard did'nt have a 'Queen' liner for their first 100 years or so.

So what? Cunard seem to have decided to name all their future ships after queens of England. That is their perogative, not ours. That being the case, the choice of the name Queen Anne is quite appropriate.

Needless to say, the names Queen Jackie and Queen Nancy do not fit the bill and are simply silly suggestions made in jest, n'est-ce pas?

Brian


Posts: 2698 | From: Pointe-Claire, QC Canada | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Brian_O
First Class Passenger
Member # 3910

posted 05-09-2004 12:07 AM      Profile for Brian_O     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by RANGERVR6178:
Wayne, I dont like whoever posted that idea.

But I guess since he was told from Pamela, he IS RIGHT!!!


He claims that Pamela Conover told him. That doesn't make it true.

Brian


Posts: 2698 | From: Pointe-Claire, QC Canada | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
CGT
First Class Passenger
Member # 3531

posted 05-09-2004 12:11 AM      Profile for CGT        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Brian_O:

So what? Cunard seem to have decided to name all their future ships after queens of England. That is their perogative, not ours.
Brian



It is, but that doesn't make it any less lame.


Posts: 2760 | From: New York, New York, USA | Registered: Dec 2002  |  IP: Logged
Ðraikar
First Class Passenger
Member # 1153

posted 05-09-2004 01:18 AM      Profile for Ðraikar   Email Ðraikar   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Its lame to make a fleet that looks the same with no identity, like some stupid clone war... Why is Carnival Cruise or Royal Caribbean International hated when they make copy's of ships but if Cunard dose, its like a blessed fart... It smells bad but because Cunard did it well its ok !?!
Posts: 1710 | From: USA, New York | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged
Brian_O
First Class Passenger
Member # 3910

posted 05-09-2004 01:38 AM      Profile for Brian_O     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Ðraikar:
Its lame to make a fleet that looks the same with no identity, like some stupid clone war... Why is Carnival Cruise or Royal Caribbean International hated when they make copy's of ships but if Cunard dose, its like a blessed fart... It smells bad but because Cunard did it well its ok !?!

What has this to do with the proposed name? "Cloning" is a separate issue and not even relevant in this case since the report suggests that Queen Anne will be similar to QM2 (which at the moment is one of a kind) rather than another Vista-class "every fleet should have one or two" clone. Identical/similar ships in the same fleet, but different from those in other fleets, used to be called sister ships.

Brian


Posts: 2698 | From: Pointe-Claire, QC Canada | Registered: Jun 2003  |  IP: Logged
Ðraikar
First Class Passenger
Member # 1153

posted 05-09-2004 01:49 AM      Profile for Ðraikar   Email Ðraikar   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Brian_O
Any ship Cunard build will be a copy of Queen Mary 2 or Vista-class, what next more copys... As some lines they may build 4 or 5 copies... Im just saying we need identity out side and in side and not just a different funnel....

Posts: 1710 | From: USA, New York | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged
Guest
First Class Passenger
Member # 1157

posted 05-09-2004 01:56 AM      Profile for Guest        Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I have the feeling Cunard will personalise all their fleet, well I hope. It seems as if that may be one of the many reasons for the delay in QV.

Do not forget the Cunard Countess / Princess twins, the Cunard Crown Twins, the Saxonia twins... but that said, the original Queens were sisters, not twins, and lusitania and Mauretania had distinct differences. You can have the same floorplan with different features externally just as you can have different floorplans with the same features externally.

Chris.


Posts: 1888 | From: Earth | Registered: Mar 2000  |  IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)
This topic is comprised of pages:  1  2  3 
 

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | CruisePage

Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.3

VACATION & CRUISE SPECIALS
Check out these great deals from CruisePage.com

Royal Caribbean - Bahamas Getaway from $129 per person
Description: Experience the beautiful ports of Nassau and Royal Caribbean's private island - CocoCay on a 3-night Weekend Getaway to the Bahamas. Absorb everything island life has to offer as you snorkel with the stingrays, parasail above the serene blue waters and walk the endless white sand beaches. From Miami.
Carnival - 4-Day Bahamas from $229 per person
Description: Enjoy a wonderful 3 Day cruise to the fun-loving playground of Nassau, Bahamas. Discover Nassau, the capital city as well as the cultural, commercial and financial heart of the Bahamas. Meet the Atlantic Southern Stingrays, the guardians of Blackbeard's treasure.
NCL - Bermuda - 7 Day from $499 per person
Description: What a charming little chain of islands. Walk on pink sand beaches. Swim and snorkel in turquoise seas. Take in the historical sights. They're stoically British and very quaint. Or explore the coral reefs. You can get to them by boat or propelled by fins. You pick. Freestyle Cruising doesn't tell you where to go or what to do. Sure, you can plan ahead, or decide once onboard. After all, it's your vacation. There are no deadlines or must do's.
Holland America - Eastern Caribbean from From $599 per person
Description: White sand, black sand, talcum soft or shell strewn, the beaches of the Eastern Caribbean invite you to swim, snorkel or simply relax. For shoppers, there's duty-free St. Thomas, the Straw Market in Nassau, French perfume and Dutch chocolates on St. Maarten. For history buffs, the fascinating fusion of Caribbean, Latin and European cultures. For everyone, a day spent on HAL's award winning private island Half Moon Cay.
Celebrity - 7-Night Western Mediterranean from $549 per person
Description: For centuries people have traveled to Europe to see magnificent ruins, art treasures and natural wonders. And the best way to do so is by cruise ship. Think of it - you pack and unpack only once. No wasted time searching for hotels and negotiating train stations. Instead, you arrive at romantic ports of call relaxed, refreshed and ready to take on the world.
Holland America - Alaska from From $499 per person
Description: Sail between Vancouver and Seward, departing Sundays on the ms Statendam or ms Volendam and enjoy towering mountains, actively calving glaciers and pristine wildlife habitat. Glacier Bay and College Fjord offer two completely different glacier-viewing experiences.

| Home | About Us | Suggest-a-Site | Feedback | Contact Us | Privacy |
This page, and all contents, are � 1995-2021 by Interactive Travel Guides, Inc. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved.
TravelPage.com is a trademark of Interactive Travel Guides, Inc.
Powered by