Log In | Customer Support
Home Book Travel Destinations Hotels Cruises Air Travel Community Search:

Search

Search CruisePage

Book a Cruise
- CruiseServer
- Search Caribbean
- Search Alaska
- Search Europe
- 888.700.TRIP

Book Online
Cruise
Air
Hotel
Car
Cruising Area:

Departure Date:
Cruise Length:

Price Range:

Cruise Line:

Buy Stuff

Reviews
- Ship Reviews
- Dream Cruise
- Ship of the Month
- Reader Reviews
- Submit a Review
- Millennium Cruise

Community
- Photo Gallery
- Join Cruise Club
- Cruise News
- Cruise News Archive
- Cruise Views
- Cruise Jobs
- Special Needs
- Maritime Q & A
- Sea Stories

Industry
- New Ship Guide
- Former Ships
- Port Information
- Inspection Scores
- Shipyards
- Ship Cams
- Ship Tracking
- Freighter Travel
- Man Overboard List
- Potpourri

Shopping
- Shirts & Hats
- Books
- Videos

Contact Us
- Reservations
- Mail
- Feedback
- Suggest-a-Site
- About Us

Reader Sites
- PamM's Site
- Ernst's Site
- Patsy's Site
- Ben's Site
- Carlos' Site
- Chris' Site
- SRead's Site


Cruise Travel - Cruise Talk
Cruise Talk Cruise News

Welcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.

>>> Reader Reviews
>>> CruisePage.com Photo Gallery
>>> Join Our Cruise Club.

Latest News...Carnival Cruise Line today announced a change in its 2027/28 deployment plan, saying that Carnival Sunshine will homeport in Galveston, Tex. instead of Carnival Spirit, and Carnival Spirit will now homeport in Tampa, Fla. Sailing 3,000 guests, Carnival Sunshine brings added capacity to Galveston to support the market’s growing demand for cruising, while also homeporting the ship...

Latest News...Four Seasons Yachts is preparing for its second Mediterranean season in 2027, unveiling 33 inspiring voyages and more than 40 compelling new ports of call. Each itinerary has been thoughtfully designed to guide guests to both iconic shores and lesser-known locales – including with the introduction of Egypt to the destination list. This expanded portfolio enriches the current collection,...

Latest News...Norwegian Cruise Line today announced the upcoming debut of what is sure to be its most electrifying entertainment experience yet — "Rocket Man: A Celebration of Elton John™," a dazzling, hit-filled tribute to the legendary icon, and the groundbreaking mixed reality show "HIKO" – scheduled to premiere on the all-new Norwegian Luna in March 2026....

More Cruise News...


Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | register | search | faq | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Cruise Talk   » Mid-Ships Lounge   » Hitting an Iceberg!

UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!    
Author Topic: Hitting an Iceberg!
Malcolm @ cruisepage
Cruise Director
Member # 301

posted 12-09-2003 07:09 PM      Profile for Malcolm @ cruisepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
...so if the QE2 (or QM2) hit an iceberg at some 20 knots, just like the Titanic did, would she sink?

What safety improvements have been made over the years, apart from more lifeboats, in terms of protection against flooding?


Posts: 19210 | From: Essex (Just Outside London) | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged
Malcolm @ cruisepage
Cruise Director
Member # 301

posted 12-13-2003 01:50 PM      Profile for Malcolm @ cruisepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I need to know...just in case!
Posts: 19210 | From: Essex (Just Outside London) | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged
Barryboat
First Class Passenger
Member # 33

posted 12-13-2003 03:24 PM      Profile for Barryboat   Author's Homepage   Email Barryboat   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Ok Malcolm....Under the exact same circumstances, a vessel like QE2 for example, would have survived hitting the iceberg, because her hull is stronger (no rivits) and she has a double bottom that extends up the sides of the hull to the waterline. Actually something very similar to the Titanic incident really did happen, and I was onboard at the time. A 400 foot long gash of puctures and scrapes tore into the hull...but QE2 remained seaworthy...(after some temporary repairs in Boston)

I don't know if a vessel like Voyager of the seas would fair as well in a Titanic incident however. Considering the emense size of the VOTS and the weight behind a collision like Titanic...there could have been some real damage.

Another thing to consider is that a modern vessel would have been able to steer away from the berg quicker than Titanic.


Posts: 1851 | From: Bloomington, Minnesota (Home to the Mall of America) | Registered: Mar 99  |  IP: Logged
Malcolm @ cruisepage
Cruise Director
Member # 301

posted 12-13-2003 03:50 PM      Profile for Malcolm @ cruisepage     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
I wonder if an iceberg would be detected on radar these days?
Posts: 19210 | From: Essex (Just Outside London) | Registered: A Long Time Ago!  |  IP: Logged
gohaze
First Class Passenger
Member # 586

posted 12-13-2003 03:55 PM      Profile for gohaze   Email gohaze   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Of course it would, but it's the growlers that are the problem.

BTW...the QE2 is not double hulled. She has double bottom tanks as do almost all ships today.

As for the damage on hitting a berg? Impossible to tell as it would depend on too many variables. Head on for example, the shape of the berg above and below water would be the most important factor. A glancing blow, as per Titanic, the where and force would determine the damage.

....peter

[ 12-13-2003: Message edited by: gohaze ]


Posts: 1909 | From: Vancouver.BC | Registered: Sep 99  |  IP: Logged
Cunardcoll
First Class Passenger
Member # 1226

posted 12-13-2003 06:06 PM      Profile for Cunardcoll   Author's Homepage   Email Cunardcoll   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
QE2 would still be able to run at normal speed to the closest port for repairs because she has a much stronger and thicker hull and a much more effecient watertight doorsystem as does QM2 and lots of other ships BUT if you would damage Titanic in the same form as Andrea Doria then Titanic would have survived , as for modern cruiseships , let me just say that they are NOT as strong as most people think but they do have good evacuation systems and lots of lifeboats.

Jochen


Posts: 947 | From: Belgium | Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged
gohaze
First Class Passenger
Member # 586

posted 12-13-2003 06:35 PM      Profile for gohaze   Email gohaze   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
QE2 would still be able to run at normal speed to the closest port

NO seaman would do anything as irresponsible as that.

....peter


Posts: 1909 | From: Vancouver.BC | Registered: Sep 99  |  IP: Logged
Barryboat
First Class Passenger
Member # 33

posted 12-13-2003 10:44 PM      Profile for Barryboat   Author's Homepage   Email Barryboat   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Let's take this a step further (as long as we are dreaming)......What if the QE2 was engaged at full throttle, and pointed directly at say....Battery Park New York, how far ashore would she get, and what kind of damage would she do? (just like in Speed 2 with the Seabourn Legend)

Sorry...a little sadistic...but it would be interesting to speculate what it would be like.


Posts: 1851 | From: Bloomington, Minnesota (Home to the Mall of America) | Registered: Mar 99  |  IP: Logged
Michael534
First Class Passenger
Member # 2953

posted 12-13-2003 10:45 PM      Profile for Michael534   Email Michael534   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Like Peter stated, it would depend on all the variables. But, yes, in the right circumstances any ship could sink as a result of a collision with an iceburg. That's why they avoid them.
Malcolm, if you know of a ship whose captain is going to take his ship through an ice field because he thinks his ship could survive a collision with a berg, please reconcider booking.

I have wondered about the role all the balconies on todays ships would play in an emergency situation.
Before balconies, if there was an abandon ship, everyone would be mustered up on deck. During a panic situtation it is human instinct to try to exit and get outside. But, with todays ships wouldn't most of the passengers in balconied cabins run out on thier balconies? What kind of problems would this cause in the evacuation? Would it be hard to get people, say on a burning ship, to re-enter thier cabins and go to thier life boat stations? Would people attempt to climb down? Or even jump as they might from a building?

I know it isn't a pleasant topic, but wonder if anyone else has any thoughts.

Michael534


Posts: 483 | From: Washington DC | Registered: Apr 2002  |  IP: Logged
gohaze
First Class Passenger
Member # 586

posted 12-13-2003 11:46 PM      Profile for gohaze   Email gohaze   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Barryboat....many years ago there was a large train ferry which had been built for the Miami - Havana run. When that finished she was put on the run from New Westminster to Whittier Alaska and re-named Alaska.
Well, one dark night coming out of Whittier she missed the turn and hit the vertical cliff straight bow on at full speed, abt 20 kts. It folded the bow back neatly like a concertina for about 50 feet.

She came south to drydock under her own power for repairs.

.....peter


Posts: 1909 | From: Vancouver.BC | Registered: Sep 99  |  IP: Logged
Ocean Liners
First Class Passenger
Member # 4013

posted 12-14-2003 01:09 AM      Profile for Ocean Liners     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Here's an article from the BOOK : QE2

Captain Jackson had gone to the bridge as the fog settled in. He consulted with the naval authorities as the QE2 was forced to reduce speed and weave in and out between the giant bergs. Finally, in spite of danger of revealing the ship's position, the radar was turned on at 0340 hours.

The Possibility of the Queen becoming trapped by icebergs or colliding with one was a more imminent risk than discovery by the enemy.
During the next 6 hours many icebergs of monstrous proportions suddenly loomed out of the misty darkness, and at one time over 100 bergs large enough to be seen by the radar were on the scan.

Each of those great masses of ice could sink a ship.

[ 12-14-2003: Message edited by: Ocean Liners ]


Posts: 4502 | From: Japan | Registered: Jul 2003  |  IP: Logged
petede
First Class Passenger
Member # 3459

posted 12-14-2003 11:46 AM      Profile for petede     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
To say that the Titanic was not as strong as today's ships is not all that true. Yes today ships are welded, but the steel plates are a bit thinner. Titanic was a terrible accident but the Arizona in 1879 hit an iceberg head on and survived. Any passenger ship hitting an iceberg head on will probably survive the collision. It is the glancing blow that the Titanic hit with that doomed her. ANY ship today hitting an iceberg of the same size and shape, in the same area of the hull will no doubt suffer the same fate, perhaps even fare worse. But the good thing is that icebergs of that size are picked up on radar. Here is a link of all iceberg hits by ships up to 2000. The list is extensive and telling. But Malcom, ships today have much better ways of avoiding such accidents, so don't worry.Iceberg hits

As for a ship running at full speed and hitting shore (like in the movie speed 2) will crush and bend her steel plates, the ship will not ride up on land, and the forward energy will be quickly dispersed.

About a fire and balconies, who knows what would happen, there will be a lot a variables, like how big and where the fire was located. The only thing I can say is that if people are trapped on the upper decks, I'm afraid they will see this as an option.

[ 12-14-2003: Message edited by: petede ]


Posts: 146 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
petede
First Class Passenger
Member # 3459

posted 12-14-2003 12:00 PM      Profile for petede     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The ship that I think is the most poignant and lest remembered is the Hans Hedtoft, a ship built for ice travel between Greenland and Demark, was on the second leg of it's maiden voyage in 1959 when she struck an iceberg and sank with all lives lost. Among the lost was a member of the Danish parliament, who, if I recall properly warned that ship traffic in that area should not be undertaken during the winter months.Hans Hedtoft I understand that next summer, an expedition under the direction of Thomas de Richelieu will attempt to find the ship to answer why she went down.
Posts: 146 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
cruiseny
First Class Passenger
Member # 2928

posted 12-14-2003 01:25 PM      Profile for cruiseny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by petede:
To say that the Titanic was not as strong as today's ships is not all that true. Yes today ships are welded, but the steel plates are a bit thinner.

It's true that today's ships are thinner, but the steel itself is of a far, far higher quality.

As an example, Aker Kvaerner owns their own steel mills, and actually monitors all of the steel that goes into the ships they built at their various yards (e.g. Masa and MTW) every step of the way, from what goes into the furnace to the point where a steel plate is welded to the ship. And sophisticated computer models calculate just what type of steel and what thickness etc. is required in a given part of the ship. In TITANIC's day this type of sophitstication didn't exist, what you had was just "mild steel" whose quality was basically unknown, and that was that.


Posts: 4730 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
petede
First Class Passenger
Member # 3459

posted 12-14-2003 02:26 PM      Profile for petede     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by cruiseny:

It's true that today's ships are thinner, but the steel itself is of a far, far higher quality.

As an example, Aker Kvaerner owns their own steel mills, and actually monitors all of the steel that goes into the ships they built at their various yards (e.g. Masa and MTW) every step of the way, from what goes into the furnace to the point where a steel plate is welded to the ship. And sophisticated computer models calculate just what type of steel and what thickness etc. is required in a given part of the ship. In TITANIC's day this type of sophitstication didn't exist, what you had was just "mild steel" whose quality was basically unknown, and that was that.



That is true, up to a point, while the steel might have been mild, riveting is a much stronger way to join steel. The problem with rivets is that they ruin a clean surface, but are a better way to join steel. Proof of this can be found in the aviation industry where riveting is still preferred in aircraft building to welding. Also the steel was the almost the same thickness all around the Titanic, where are you stated, today it is thinner along the sides, where Titanic took most of her damage. All in all, I think that Titanic was a much stronger, (and safer in many ways) ship than any cruise ship built today.

Posts: 146 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Nov 2002  |  IP: Logged
cruiseny
First Class Passenger
Member # 2928

posted 12-14-2003 02:49 PM      Profile for cruiseny     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by petede:
rivets is that they ruin a clean surface, but are a better way to join steel.

I'm not so sure of that... After all on TITANIC a lot of the problem was popped rivets!

Do you think welds would have actually fared worse in that situation?

quote:
the steel was the almost the same thickness all around the Titanic, where are you stated, today it is thinner along the sides

But thickness doesn't necessarily equal strength. A lot of it has to do with the quality of the steel and in the case of TITANIC that left a lot to be desired.

Posts: 4730 | From: New York, USA | Registered: Mar 2002  |  IP: Logged
gohaze
First Class Passenger
Member # 586

posted 12-14-2003 06:24 PM      Profile for gohaze   Email gohaze   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
The main reason that rivetting is used in aircraft construction is because welding such thin material creates problems with stress and distortion, and hence cracking.

A big problem with the steel used in the days of the Titanic was it's brittleness, something not understood at that time or for many years after.

....peter


Posts: 1909 | From: Vancouver.BC | Registered: Sep 99  |  IP: Logged
sslewis
First Class Passenger
Member # 3649

posted 12-17-2003 09:23 AM      Profile for sslewis   Author's Homepage   Email sslewis   Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
How about the amazing survival of ts Maksim Gorky in 1989?
I saw some dramatic footage of her bows down to the anchor and the propellers completely dry!
Yet, she survived, was repaired and even hosted a important East-West meeting afterwards!
ssLewis, unforgettable

Posts: 2513 | From: Shipspotting Solent shores when weather allows.... | Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Matts
First Class Passenger
Member # 4120

posted 12-18-2003 10:42 AM      Profile for Matts     Send New Private Message      Edit/Delete Post  Reply With Quote 
Just an observation but I wonder how good the evacuation systems really are. The reason for my wondering is watching the lifeboat drills of a couple of Voyager class ships in Miami a couple of weeks ago. It was well over 30 mins between sirens and mustering. The wierdest thing was the last lifeboat at the stern of the ship only seemed to be accessed by people gingerly walking single file around the glass wall (of the restaurant). There must be another way to those particular boats or they would be worse than useless in an emergency. Presumably these things have all been fully simulated but I must confess surprise at the time taken to get everyone there and wondering whether a full evac in 30 mins would be possible?
Posts: 829 | From: London, United Kingdom | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged

All times are ET (US)  

Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
Hop To:

Contact Us | CruisePage

Infopop Corporation
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.3

VACATION & CRUISE SPECIALS
Check out these great deals from CruisePage.com

Royal Caribbean - Bahamas Getaway from $129 per person
Description: Experience the beautiful ports of Nassau and Royal Caribbean's private island - CocoCay on a 3-night Weekend Getaway to the Bahamas. Absorb everything island life has to offer as you snorkel with the stingrays, parasail above the serene blue waters and walk the endless white sand beaches. From Miami.
Carnival - 4-Day Bahamas from $229 per person
Description: Enjoy a wonderful 3 Day cruise to the fun-loving playground of Nassau, Bahamas. Discover Nassau, the capital city as well as the cultural, commercial and financial heart of the Bahamas. Meet the Atlantic Southern Stingrays, the guardians of Blackbeard's treasure.
NCL - Bermuda - 7 Day from $499 per person
Description: What a charming little chain of islands. Walk on pink sand beaches. Swim and snorkel in turquoise seas. Take in the historical sights. They're stoically British and very quaint. Or explore the coral reefs. You can get to them by boat or propelled by fins. You pick. Freestyle Cruising doesn't tell you where to go or what to do. Sure, you can plan ahead, or decide once onboard. After all, it's your vacation. There are no deadlines or must do's.
Holland America - Eastern Caribbean from From $599 per person
Description: White sand, black sand, talcum soft or shell strewn, the beaches of the Eastern Caribbean invite you to swim, snorkel or simply relax. For shoppers, there's duty-free St. Thomas, the Straw Market in Nassau, French perfume and Dutch chocolates on St. Maarten. For history buffs, the fascinating fusion of Caribbean, Latin and European cultures. For everyone, a day spent on HAL's award winning private island Half Moon Cay.
Celebrity - 7-Night Western Mediterranean from $549 per person
Description: For centuries people have traveled to Europe to see magnificent ruins, art treasures and natural wonders. And the best way to do so is by cruise ship. Think of it - you pack and unpack only once. No wasted time searching for hotels and negotiating train stations. Instead, you arrive at romantic ports of call relaxed, refreshed and ready to take on the world.
Holland America - Alaska from From $499 per person
Description: Sail between Vancouver and Seward, departing Sundays on the ms Statendam or ms Volendam and enjoy towering mountains, actively calving glaciers and pristine wildlife habitat. Glacier Bay and College Fjord offer two completely different glacier-viewing experiences.

| Home | About Us | Suggest-a-Site | Feedback | Contact Us | Privacy |
This page, and all contents, are � 1995-2021 by Interactive Travel Guides, Inc. and/or its suppliers. All rights reserved.
TravelPage.com is a trademark of Interactive Travel Guides, Inc.
Powered by