Welcome to Cruise Talk the Internet's most popular discussion forum dedicated to cruising. Stop by Cruise Talk anytime to post a message or find out what your fellow passengers and industry insiders are saying about a particular ship, cruise line or destination.
>>> Reader Reviews >>> CruisePage.com Photo Gallery >>> Join Our Cruise Club.
Latest News...Norwegian Cruise Line celebrated the debut of the all-new Norwegian Aqua to Port Canaveral, Fla. on Saturday, April 26, 2025, where she commenced her inaugural season of round-trip Caribbean cruises as the newest ship in port. This past weekend, approximately 3,700 guests embarked on Norwegian Aqua's first week-long voyage to the Caribbean from Port Canaveral, Fla., her initial homeport ...
Latest News...Royal Caribbean Group (NYSE: RCL) today reported first quarter Earnings per Share ("EPS") of $2.70 and Adjusted EPS of $2.71. These results were better than the company's guidance due to stronger than expected pricing on close-in demand and lower costs mainly due to timing. Royal Caribbean said that it is increasing its full year 2025 Adjusted EPS guidance to $14.55 to $15.55...
Latest News...Holland America Line announced itineraries for its two Grand Voyages sailing in 2027, offering guests the choice to embark on an ambitious 129-day circumnavigation of the globe on the 2027 Grand World Voyage or a 70-day, region-specific in-depth exploration on the Grand South America & Antarctica Voyage. As revealed today by the cruise line's president Beth Bodensteiner to guests on board...
Good Stability from my experience and word of mouth:
Rotterdam V/RembrandtCanberraFrance/NorwayStella Solaris
Bring Dramamine:
Regal Empress/OlympiaSea BreezeCaroniaVision of the SeasBig Red Boat IIQueen Mary
Anybody share knowledge? please post
How can you compare the stability of ships anyway? The QM may well have tossed around in a Transatlantic gale, but how would Explorer of the sea perform in the same conditions? Would the Norway and QE2 perfom better or worse than the QM in exactly the same conditions?
We can only speculate! Just because a passenger had a rough ride or smooth cruise, it is hardly a scientific measure.
However, we do know that modern flat bottomed ships are built not built for rough conditions.
Strat.
The ships that can make you sick:Soveriegn of the Seas - THE WORSTAmerikanisHolidayZenith
Queen Mary was a very good seaboat, but she did tend to roll steadily. Normandie was a snappy roller, but would achieve a greater roll degree than the Queen Mary would.
I almost forgot about that fact that there were no handrails installed in Queen Mary's cooridors, until after the first voyage. When handrails were installed in the Queen Mary, they used a brand new technology of the day, called "plastic".
I sailed on the Horizon twice and it was a smooth cruise (nyc to Bermuda both times). I then went on the Zenith (NYC to Bermuda) it gave a rough ride.
Barryboat-- I felt the pitching every night at sea especially in the showlounge.
Once again, I digress. My point is that for the rest of both cruises, it was very smooth, so pretty much no matter what ship you are on, if the sea is rough, people are gonna get sick and some won't. Some (people and ships) suffer more than others but water and fresh fruit works a treat.
Paddy.
I too enjoy a bit of rolling, but my girlfriend was very ill on the Sunbird ... at the captain's table! She went down to the medical centre where the ship's doctor gave her a miracle injection which had her right as rain within a couple of hours.
The doc, an Aussie, was hilarious. "A quick one up the bottom will fix it!" Eek! I think going to Name That Tune would have been preferable!!
It's all down to perception. They all role and pitch in force 8 gales!
In fact I've seen passengers look at a moderate swell and comment how "rough" the sea is! I bet some folks in a force 8, claim they have sailed in conditions "twice as bad"?
My unscientific judge of boat rocking is to look at the water movement in the swimming pools.
One of the many reasons Carnival turned their nose up at her is because she would rock too much even with stabilizers.
Lusi-Mauritania were known as rough riders too-built for speed.
The 2 extra decks on the Norway required ballasting on the tank top areas. This has compromised her excellent stability. She rocks but gently. Motions are slow.
Norway was specified to be 1035' long so it would ride on all 3 waves at once in formation to eliminate pitching.
I rode the Canberra in storm with 50' waves. She did rock, but took the waves washing up to the boat deck in stride.
On the Stella Oceanis; we were in a winter storm on the South Atlantic, she would hit a trough, the ship would shudder and glasses would break and few kids screamed.
Ultimate Bulletin BoardTM 6.1.0.3
More Vacation & Cruise Specials...